Back

In Silico ModeIling of Shear Stress and Energy Dissipation Rate Effects on Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Proliferation in Vertical-Wheel Bioreactors

Avikpe, F. R.; Alibhai, F. J.; Romero, D. A.; Mostofinejad, A.; Bauer, J. E. S.; Montague, C.; Laflamme, M.; Amon, C. H.

2026-04-26 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.22.720266 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) hold significant promise for regenerative medicine, yet optimizing their expansion in three-dimensional bioreactor systems remains challenging due to complex interactions between mechanical forces, metabolic constraints, and aggregate formation dynamics. This study developed and validated a mechanistic mathematical model to predict hPSC proliferation dynamics in vertical-wheel bioreactor (VWBR) systems, incorporating the effects of shear stress and energy dissipation rate (EDR) on cell growth and aggregate dynamics. Seven model variants employing different kinetic formulations for shear stress and energy dissipation rate effects were systematically evaluated through model selection, identifiability analyses, and experimental validation. Experimental data from six bioreactor conditions varying in initial cell density (2 x 104-15 x 104 cells/mL), agitation rate (30-60 RPM), and working volume (100-500 mL) were used for model calibration and selection. Bayesian Information Criterion analysis identified a model combining Michaelis-Menten kinetics for shear stress inhibition with a EDR-mediated aggregate detachment formulation as the best-performing variant, achieving a Mean Relative Prediction Error of 13.97%, comparable to the experimental variability of 16.29%. Independent validation experiments using leave-out data gathered under different media exchange schedules confirmed model accuracy with prediction errors below 14%, consistent with observed experimental variability around 12%. The validated model was used to optimize the media exchange protocol, leading to a 37.5% reduction in media consumption with only a 13.5% reduction in final cell yield, demonstrating its utility for prospective, quantitative bioprocess design in VWBR systems.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
4
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
6
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
12
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
14
Journal of Biological Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
22
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%
25
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%