Back

Environmental filtering, dispersal limitation, and competition control the distribution of acidophilic iron oxidizers

Grettenberger, C. L.; Williams, C.; Hamilton, T.

2026-04-23 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.22.720147 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acid mine drainage is a global pollution problem characterized by low pH and high concentrations of metals. Active remediation is often cost-prohibitive, but Fe(II) oxidizing microbes may be used for passive bioremediation. To leverage these species, we must understand the factors that control their distribution. Here, we examine the environmental and ecological factors that control these species with the aim of determining if microbial seeding is a viable remediation strategy. Although stochastic processes appear to control the distribution of majority of taxa inhabiting AMD ecosystems, the distribution of Fe(II) oxidizers is driven by environmental filtering and competition. The abundance of all the major Fe(II) oxidizing genera have significant relationships with pH, with pH explaining 10 - 38% of the variation in their abundance. The genera appear to have pH preferences with Acidithiobacillus and Leptospirillum preferring environments below pH 3, Gallionella, Sideroxydans, and Ferritrophicum preferring environments above pH 3.5, and Ferrovum preferring intermediate pH environments. Once the effect of pH is removed, genera that share pH preferences are negatively correlated, indicating that they are likely competing for the Fe(II) oxidizing niche in their preferred environments. Communities are also shaped by dispersal limitation, which suggests that microbial seeding is possible in these environments. Future seeding attempts should consider species interactions and ecology more generally to inform their efforts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
2
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.1%
4
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
5
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.1%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
14
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
16
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%