PanVariants: Best Practice for Pangenome-based Variant Calling Pipeline and Framework
Yi, H.; Wang, L.; Chen, X.; Ding, Y.; Carroll, A.; Chang, P.-C.; Shafin, K.; Xu, L.; Zeng, X.; Zhao, X.; Gong, M.; Wei, X.; Hou, Y.; Ni, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlthough pangenome references offer richer population diversity compared to linear references, current mainstream pangenome-based variant callers are limited to detecting only known variants stored in the graph. To address this limitation, we developed PanVariants, a novel pipeline designed to improve the detection of both known and novel variants accurately. We systematically evaluated its performance against the traditional linear alignment solution (BWA+GATK/Manta) and the existing pangenome-aware solution (DRAGEN/PanGenie) in three contexts: small variants (SNVs/indels) and structural variants (SVs) accuracy in Genome in a Bottle samples, clinical detection on positive samples, and application in cohort-based joint calling. ResultsBy integrating k-mer-based and mapping-based methods, PanVariants significantly reduced variant errors (FPs + FNs), achieving a 73% reduction compared to BWA+GATK and a 45% reduction compared to DRAGEN for SNVs. Retraining the DeepVariant model with high-quality DNBSEQ data further decreased errors by 15%. For SVs detection, PanVariants attained an F1-score of 89.39%, markedly outperforming DRAGEN (68.18%) and BWA+Manta (58.33%), approaching long-read sequencing performance (95.22%). In validation using clinical positive samples, PanVariants successfully detected all expected pathogenic variants while PanGenie failed. In the cohort joint-calling analysis, PanVariants detected more variants, made fewer Mendelian inheritance errors, and gave better per-sample accuracy than GATK. ConclusionsPanVariants establishes a robust framework and best-practice pipeline for pangenome-based variant detection, achieving both sensitive novel variant discovery and high accuracy for SNVs, indels and SVs. Our systematic evaluation of optional processing steps and input variables offers practical guidance for users. Validated across diagnostic and population-based applications, our findings strongly support the transition from linear to pangenome references in future genomics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate Identification of Extrachromosomal Circular DNA from Long-read Sequences. 96%
- Benchmarking copy number aberrations inference tools using single-cell multi-omics datasets 94%
- Accelerate the discovery of genetic variants in mitochondrial diseases with VIOLA: Variant PrIOritization using Latent space 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.