Genetic and Environmental Predictors of Seasonality and Seasonal Affective Disorder in Individuals with Depression

BackgroundThe etiology and nosological status of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) as a specifier of depressive episodes versus a transdiagnostic disorder are the subject of debate. In this study, we investigated the underlying etiology of SAD and dimensional seasonality by examining their association with latitude and genetic risk for a range of traits, and investigated gene-environment interactions. MethodsThis study included 12,460 adults aged 18-90 with a history of depression from the Australian Genetics of Depression Study. Regression models included predictors for latitude (distance from equator) and polygenic scores for eight traits; major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, chronotype, sleep duration, body mass index, vitamin D levels, and educational attainment. Outcomes were SAD status and general seasonality score. ResultsSAD was positively associated with latitude (OR[95%CI] = 1.05[1.03-1.06], padjusted<0.001), and there was nominal evidence of additive and multiplicative interactions between chronotype genetic risk and latitude (OR = 0.99[0.99-0.99], padjusted=0.381; OR=0.98[0.97-0.99], padjusted=0.489). General seasonality score was associated with latitude (IRR=1.01[1.01-1.01], padjusted 0.001) and genetic risk for major depressive disorder (IRR =1.02[1.01-1.03], padjusted<0.001), bipolar disorder (IRR=1.02[1.01-1.03], padjusted=0.001), anxiety disorders (IRR=1.03[1.01-1.04], padjusted<0.001), vitamin D levels (OR=0.89[0.80-0.95], padjusted=0.048), and educational attainment (IRR=0.97[0.96-0.99], padjusted<0.001). ConclusionsThese findings enhance understanding of SAD etiology, highlighting contributions of psychiatric genetic risk and geographic measures on seasonal behavior, and support examining seasonality as a continuous dimension.