Back

Patient perspectives on living with hypertension: Social media listening analysis across predominantly high-income countries

Di Somma, S.; Gervais, R.; Bains, M.; Carter-Williams, S.; Messner, S.; Onsongo, N.

2026-04-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351483 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic conditions such as hypertension can significantly disrupt daily life and emotional well-being. The interaction between patients perceptions, adherence to antihypertensive medication and quality of life (QoL) remains underexplored outside structured clinical settings. ObjectivesTo capture unprompted patient perspectives and assess whether hypertension affects QoL and to investigate if patient reported experiences are associated with self-reported antihypertensive medication adherence. MethodsSocial media listening (SML) study analyzing 86,368 anonymized posts from individuals with hypertension in 12 countries, collected between January 2022 and May 2024. Posts from 11 countries (n=81,368) were analyzed using artificial intelligence-enabled natural language processing. Posts from China (n=5,000) were analyzed separately using a harmonized framework. Quantitative and qualitative methods assessed variations by country, age, and gender, and associations between emotional expression and antihypertensive medication adherence. ResultsAcross the 11-country core sample, 45% of posts mentioned at least one QoL impact, most commonly worry/anxiety (11%). Impacts varied across countries. Among 8,096 posts with age identified, individuals <40 years reported emotional balance impacts in 28% of posts versus 22% among those aged 40+. Work/Education impacts were mentioned in 17% of posts by those <40 years vs 12% in 40+. Among 7968 posts explicitly referencing adherence, expressed worry was associated with stricter adherence (62% association score), as were structured routines (79% score), home monitoring (77%), dietary changes (77%), and exercise (71%). In contrast, sadness/depression was associated with inconsistent adherence (71%), as were forgetfulness (79%), side effects (73%), and cost/insurance concerns (65%). ConclusionsThese results emphasize the importance of the psychological and emotional impact of hypertension, including on adherence to medication regimens, reinforcing the value of a holistic approach to patient care. Plain language summaryMany people have high blood pressure, which increases the risk for stroke and other harmful events. Although there is much medical research on high blood pressure, little is known about the experiences of those people who live with the condition. This study aimed to scope out how people react emotionally and how their high blood pressure affects their daily lives. To do this, we analyzed social media posts from the United States, Canada, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Japan, South Korea, China, and Australia. In all countries, patients were affected emotionally by their high blood pressure. People often worried, particularly when they received their diagnosis. High blood pressure also negatively affected everyday life and work/education. This was often due to frequent medical appointments with lengthy wait times and difficulty accessing specialists. Taking medications regularly and sticking to diet and exercise programs was more difficult for individuals who reported being sad or depressed, or who suffered from side effects of their medications. The findings show that efficient management of high blood pressure has to take into account the emotional reactions of those who are affected, and provide support in several areas beyond the prescription of medication.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.4%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
21
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%