Back

Persistent Atrial Myopathy Despite Ventricular Recovery: Prognostic Significance of Discordant LV-LA Strain Patterns in HFrEF

Park, J.; Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, H.-K.; Bae, N. Y.; Lim, J.; Kwak, S.; Bak, M.; Choi, H.-M.; Park, J.-B.; Yoon, Y. E.; Lee, S. P.; Kim, Y.-J.; Cho, G.-Y.

2026-04-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351480 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aims: Assessment of treatment response in HFrEF has largely relied on left ventricular (LV)-centric parameters, yet the left atrium (LA) plays a central role in modulating LV filling and reflects the cumulative hemodynamic burden. Whether discordant recovery between LV and LA function carries distinct prognostic implications in patients treated with ARNI-based therapy remains unknown. Methods and results: From the multicenter STRATS-HF-ARNI registry, 1,182 patients with HFrEF who underwent serial echocardiography at baseline and one-year follow-up were included. Patients were classified into four strain recovery phenotypes according to the direction of change in LVGLS and LASr at one year: Group A, concordant recovery (57.4%); Group B, discordant atrial non-recovery (11.2%); Group C, discordant ventricular non-recovery (15.6%); and Group D, concordant non-recovery (16.0%). Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalization. Despite achieving LV functional improvement, Group B exhibited persistent LASr deterioration, accompanied by less favorable hemodynamic trajectories compared with Group A. On multivariable Cox regression, Group B was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-7.79) and cardiovascular mortality (aHR 5.68, 95% CI 1.91-16.92), comparable to Group D. Group C demonstrated higher HF hospitalization risk (aHR 2.25, 95% CI 1.31-3.86). The adverse prognostic impact of discordant atrial non-recovery was consistently observed across subgroups stratified by baseline LVGLS and LASr levels. Conclusion: In HFrEF patients treated with ARNI-based therapy, persistent LA dysfunction despite LV functional improvement identifies a high-risk phenotype comparable to concordant non-recovery. These findings suggest that concurrent assessment of LV and LA strain may provide incremental prognostic value beyond LV-centric metrics alone.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.1%
2
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
6
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
8
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
13
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%