Back

Assessment of Minidock MTB for the diagnosis of tuberculosis from sputum in patients presenting to health facilities in Indonesia

Hartati, S.; Koesoemadinata, R. C.; Sharples, K. J.; McAllister, S. M.; Chaidir, L.; Setiaputri, I.; Emmanuel, E.; van Crevel, R.; Graham, S.; Hill, P. C.; Alisjahbana, B.

2026-04-30 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351245 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccess to tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics remains limited in high-burden countries, partly due to centralised and complex testing. We evaluated MiniDock MTB, a low-complexity near point-of-care (nPOC) assay, in sputum for diagnostic accuracy and agreement with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert). MethodsFrom September 2024 to April 2025, presumptive pulmonary TB cases aged >28 days were consecutively enrolled at 15 community health centres, a lung clinic, and a lung hospital in Bandung, Indonesia. Sputum was tested with MiniDock MTB on sputum swab, Xpert, and liquid culture. We assessed diagnostic accuracy against microbiological and composite reference standards (CRS) and agreement with Xpert. ResultsFrom 3051 individuals screened, 671 were eligible and included; 533 were adults (aged [≥]15 years), 138 were children. Overall, 126 were Xpert-positive and 132 culture-positive. In adults, MiniDock MTB sensitivity was 86.2% (110/116; 95% CI 78.8 - 91.3) and 55.8% (110/197; 95% CI 48.9 - 62.6) against liquid culture and CRS, respectively; small numbers of positive results precluded estimation in children. Specificity ranged from 96.8% to 98.8%. Overall agreement between MiniDock MTB and Xpert (excluding trace positive) was 94.8% (95% CI 92.6 - 96.3; K = 0.84). Positive percent agreement was 82.8% (95% CI 75.1 - 88.4) and 25% (95% CI 4.6 - 69.9) in adults and children, respectively, and reduced with lower bacillary burden (p = 0.004). ConclusionsSensitivity of MiniDock MTB in sputum against liquid culture exceeded the WHO threshold for a sputum-based nPOC TB test in adults. There was high agreement with Xpert but reduced sensitivity in low-bacillary burden TB disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
4
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
17
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%