Back

Investigating Uptake and Impact of Genetic and Genomic Evaluation Following a Perinatal Demise

Mossler, K.; D'Orazio, E.; Hall, K.; Osann, K.; Kimonis, V.; Quintero-Rivera, F.

2026-04-23 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.22.26347546 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective The decline of the perinatal demise rate is slowing and demises are often unexplained. Significant research has been done regarding diagnostic yield and genetic causes of demise, but little is known about how Geneticist involvement impacts outcomes. The goal of the study was to evaluate post-mortem genetic testing practices and effects of the geneticists involvement. Methods Retrospective data from 111 perinatal demise cases was examined, including rates of prenatal genetic counseling, post-delivery genetics consult, genetic testing, and autopsy investigation. Results In this cohort 54% received genetic testing and 25% received a genetics consult. When compared to those without, cases with genetic specialist involvement were associated with significant increases in testing uptake (p=0.007), diagnostic yield (p<0.001), and patient education (p<0.001). Second trimester stillbirths and those with fewer ultrasound (US) abnormalities were less likely to receive genetic testing (both p values <0.001) and consults (p<0.001, p=0.020). Conclusion Though it was not possible to avoid ascertainment bias, this data demonstrates that geneticist involvement correlates with a higher rate of testing, greater diagnostic yield, and more thorough counseling. These findings underscore the importance of integrating genetics providers into perinatal postmortem healthcare teams.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
22
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
26
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%