Back

Towards In Vivo Wearable Diagnostics in Orthopaedics: Sensorized Bone Cement for Knee Spacer Applications

Tran, N. B.; Capogrosso, L.; Dillitzer, C.; Morandell, P.; Lallinger, V.; Heller, S.; Burgkart, R.; Lazic, I.; Hayden, O.

2026-04-23 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.21.719845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of total knee arthroplasty and is a leading cause of revision surgery, and is associated with significant morbidity. Two-stage exchange using antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacers remains the clinical gold standard, yet the decision to reimplant relies largely on indirect markers and clinical judgment, as no method allows continuous in situ assessment of infection resolution. Here, we report a sensorized knee spacer that transforms PMMA bone cement from a passive structural material into an active, wearable diagnostic device. A miniaturized multimodal sensor unit integrating optoelectronic and physicochemical sensing was embedded within the tibial spacer component and wirelessly coupled, enabling energy-efficient, 24/7 in vivo monitoring during the spacer interval for several months. We developed a reproducible encapsulation and integration strategy compatible with clinically realistic spatial, thermal, and mechanical constraints, without altering the established surgical workflow. The functionality of the embedded camera, spectrometer, and temperature sensors following cement integration was verified. Mechanical integrity and signal stability were confirmed under ISO-compliant dynamic biomechanical loading conditions. In vivo validation of the implantable wearable was preclinically demonstrated in a porcine model using human knee spacer dimensions. These findings establish the technical feasibility of sensor-integrated PMMA spacers and introduce bone cement as an enabling platform for smart orthopedic implants. Continuous, local monitoring of the peri-implant environment may open new pathways for evidence-based decision-making in infection management with temporary implantable wearables.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
3
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.8%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.0%
7
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
8
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
9
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
12
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%