X-Chromosome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel Genetic Signals for Heart Failure and Subtypes
Ren, J.; VA Million Veteran Program, ; Liu, C.; Hui, Q.; Rahafrooz, M.; Kosik, N. M.; Urak, K.; Moser, J.; Muralidhar, S.; Pereira, A.; Cho, K.; Gaziano, J. M.; Wilson, P. W. F.; Million Veteran Program, V.; Phillips, L. S.; Sun, Y.; Joseph, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundHeart failure (HF) is a major and growing public health problem, and prior studies support a meaningful genetic contribution to HF susceptibility. Clinically, HF is commonly categorized into the major clinical sub-types of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which differ in pathophysiology and clinical profiles. However, previous genome-wide association studies have focused on autosomal variation and have routinely excluded the X chromosome, leaving X-linked genetic contributions to HF and its subtypes under-characterized. MethodsWe performed X-chromosome wide association study (XWAS) utilizing directly genotyped data from 590,568 Million Veteran Program participants, including 90,694 HF cases across European, African, Hispanic, and Asian Americans. Sex- and ancestry-stratified logistic regression was used with XWAS quality control measures, adjusting for age and population structure, followed by fixed-effects multi-ancestry meta-analysis. Functional annotation, gene-based testing, fine-mapping, and colocalization were performed. We replicated genetic associations with all-cause HF in the UK Biobank. ResultsIn the multi-ancestry meta-analysis, we identified five X-chromosome-wide significant loci for all-cause HF, five for HFrEF, and one locus for HFpEF in males. No loci reached significance in female-specific analyses. In sex-combined analyses, we identified six loci for all-cause HF and four for HFrEF. The strongest and most emphasized signals mapped to genes were BRWD3, FHL1, and CHRDL1. Ancestry-specific analyses revealed additional loci, including NDP and WDR44 in African ancestry and PHF8 in Hispanic ancestry. One locus, BRWD3, was replicated in UK Biobank HF cohort. Integrated post-GWAS analyses (fine-mapping, colocalization and pleiotropy trait association studies) reinforced the biological plausibility of the X-linked signals. ConclusionsThis multi-ancestry, sex-stratified XWAS identifies X-linked genetic contributions to HF and its subtypes and highlights the role of X-chromosome in heart failure pathogenesis.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Architecture of Heart Failure with Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction 97%
- Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify novel protein biomarkers and drug targets for primary prevention of heart failure 96%
- Tissue-specific multiOMICs analysis of atrial fibrillation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A validated heart-specific model for splice-disrupting variants in childhood heart disease 93%
- Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic-requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions 93%
- The genetic case for cardiorespiratory fitness as a clinical vital sign and the routine prescription of physical activity in healthcare 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A genotype-phenotype taxonomy of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 94%
- Genetic architecture of cardiac structure and function 93%
- Multi-ethnic genome-wide association study of decomposed cardioelectric phenotypes illustrates strategies to identify and characterize evidence of shared genetic effects for complex traits 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using human genetics to understand the causes and consequences of circulating cardiac troponin I in the general population 94%
- A genome-first approach to rare variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genes MYBPC3 and MYH7 in a medical biobank 94%
- Analysis of putative cis-regulatory elements regulating blood pressure variation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.