Back

Improving Care by FAster risk-STratification through use of high sensitivity point-of-care troponin in patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndrome in the EmeRgency department (ICare-FASTER): a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial

Than, M.; Pickering, J. W.; Joyce, L. R.; Buchan, V. A.; Florkowski, C. M.; Mills, N. L.; Hamill, L.; Prystowsky, J.; Harger, S.; Reed, M.; Bayless, J.; Feberwee, A.; Attenburrow, T.; Norman, T.; Welfare, O.; Heiden, T.; Kavsak, P.; Jaffe, A. S.; apple, f.; Peacock, W. F.; Cullen, L.; Aldous, S.; Richards, A. M.; Lacey, C.; Troughton, R.; Frampton, C.; Body, R.; Mueller, C.; Lord, S. J.; George, P. M.; Devlin, G.

2026-04-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351433 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDPoint-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) testing has the potential to expedite decision-making and reduce emergency department (ED) length of stay for patients presenting with possible myocardial infarction (MI) by ensuring that results are consistently available when looked for by clinicians. We assessed the real-life effectiveness and safety of implementing POC hs-cTn testing in the ED. METHODSWe conducted a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. The control arm was usual care with an accelerated diagnostic pathway utilizing a single-sample rule-out step with a central laboratory hs-cTn assay. The intervention arm used the same pathway with a POC hs-cTnI. The primary effectiveness outcome was ED length of stay assessed using a generalized linear mixed model, and the safety outcome was 30-day MI or cardiac death. RESULTSSix sites participated with 59,980 ED presentations (44,747 individuals, 61{+/-}19 years, 49.5% female) from February 2023 to January 2025, in which 31,392 presentations were during the intervention arm. After adjustment for co-variates associated with length of stay, the intervention reduced length of stay by 13% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 9 to 16%. P<0.001), corresponding to a reduction of 47 minutes (95%CI, 33 to 61 minutes) from a mean length of stay in the control arm of 376 minutes. The 30-day MI or cardiac death rate was similar in the control and intervention arms (0.39% and 0.39% respectively, P=0.54). CONCLUSIONSImplementation of whole-blood hs-cTnI testing at the POC into an accelerated diagnostic pathway was safe and reduced length of stay in the ED compared with laboratory testing. (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001189112) Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat is new?C_ST_ABSO_LIPoint-of-care troponin assays with good precision have become available and received regulatory approval as high-sensitivity assays. C_LIO_LIA pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial implementing the validated Siemens VTLi high-sensitivity point-of-care assay into 6 emergency departments investigating [~]60,000 patients, was conducted to ascertain if the rapid turnaround time reduced lengths of stay. C_LIO_LIIntroduction of the VTLi high-sensitivity point-of-care assay into clinical pathways reduced emergency department lengths of stay by an average 13% (47 minutes) without compromising safety. C_LI What are the clinical implications?O_LIEarly decision-making using a point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin assay within a structured clinical pathway was safe. C_LIO_LIFaster turnaround means troponin results are consistently available when clinicians first seek them. This can facilitate earlier decisions and reduce patient length of stay. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
16.9%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.8%
3
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.1%
6
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.8%
8
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
13
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
14
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
22
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
26
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%