Back

Missed Opportunities for Stroke Prevention in Hypertensive Patients: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Kim, C.; Huang, C.; Sawano, M.; Young, P.; McPadden, J.; Anderson, M.; Burrows, J. S.; Krumholz, H. M.; Brush, J. E.; Lu, Y.

2026-04-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351407 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for ischemic stroke, yet the adequacy of preventative hypertension care in routine clinical practice remains suboptimal. Whether gaps in hypertension management represent missed opportunities for stroke prevention remains unclear. ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between hypertension care delivery and the risk of incident ischemic stroke. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, matched, nested case-control study among adults with hypertension using electronic health record data from a large regional health system (2010-2024). Patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke were matched 1:2 to controls on age, sex, race and ethnicity, and calendar time. Three care metrics were assessed during follow-up: (1) outpatient visits with blood pressure (BP) measurement per year; (2) number of antihypertensive medication ingredients; and (3) medication intensification score. Conditional logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs). ResultsThe study included 13,476 cases and 26,952 matched controls (N = 40,428). Mean (SD) age was 64.8 (12.2) years, 54.1% were female, and mean follow-up was 2,497 (1,308) days. Cases had fewer BP visits per year (median, 2.50 vs. 3.01; p < 0.001), similar number of medication ingredients (2.00 vs 2.00), and lower treatment intensification scores (-0.211 vs - 0.125). In adjusted models, >5 BP visits per year was associated with lower stroke odds (aOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.51-0.59) compared with [&le;]1 visit. Use of 2-3 medication ingredients (vs 0) was also associated with reduced stroke odds (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86), whereas >3 ingredients was not significant. The highest quartile of treatment intensification showed the strongest association (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51). Findings were consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses, including strata defined by baseline SBP and follow-up SBP. ConclusionsGreater engagement in hypertension care was associated with lower odds of ischemic stroke, suggesting that gaps in routine management may represent missed opportunities for prevention.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.3%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.3%
3
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
6
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%