Back

Diagnostic Classification for Long Covid Patients identifying Persistent Virus and Hyperimmune Pathophysiologies

James-Pemberton, P.; Harper, D.; Wagerfield, P.; Watson, C.; Hervada, L.; Kohli, S.; Alder, S.; Shaw, A.

2026-04-22 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351402 medRxiv
Show abstract

A multiplex diagnostic test is evaluated for self-reported long COVID associated persistent symptoms and a poor recovery from a SARS-CoV-2 infection. A mass-standardised concentration of total antibodies (AC), high-quality (HQ) antibodies and percentage of HQ antibodies (HQ%) is assessed against a spectrum of spike proteins to the SARS-CoV-2 variants: Wuhan, , {delta}, and the Omicron variants BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.2.75, BA.5, CH.1.1, BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in three cohorts. A cohort of control patients (n = 46) recovered (CC) and a cohort of self-declared long COVID patients (n = 113) (LCC). A nested Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, performed for the variant with lowest HQ concentration in the spectrum, produced an area under the curve and AUC = 0.61 (0.53-0.70) for the CC vs LCC cohorts. For the LCC cohort, the cut-off thresholds for AC = 0.8 mg/L, HQ = 1.5 mg/L and HQ% of 34% were determined, leading to a 71% sensitivity and 66% specificity derived by the Youden metric. The cohorts may be fully classified based on ROC and outlier analysis to give an incidence of persistent virus 62% (95% CI 52% - 71%), hyperimmune 12% (95% CI 7% - 20%) and unclassified, 26% (95% CI 18% - 35%). The overall diagnostic accuracy for both the hyper and hypo immune is 69%. All clinical interventions can now be tailored for the heterogenous long COVID patient cohort.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
3
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.3%
8
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
20
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
22
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
23
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
24
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
27
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
28
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
30
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%