Back

Deep Learning-Based Detection of Focal Cortical Dysplasia in Children: External Validation of the MELD Graph and 3D-nnUNet pipelines

Dell'Orco, A.; De Vita, E.; D'Arco, F.; Lange, A.; Rüber, T.; Kaindl, A. M.; Wattjes, M. P.; Thomale, U. W.; Becker, L.-L.; Tietze, A.

2026-04-22 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351368 medRxiv
Show abstract

Focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) are one of the most common structural causes of drug-resistant epilepsy in children but are frequently subtle and difficult to detect on conventional MRI. Many automated lesion detection methods have therefore been proposed to support neuroradiological assessment. In this study, we externally validated two recently developed deep-learning approaches for FCD detection, MELD Graph and 3D-nnUNet, in a pediatric cohort. In this retrospective single-center study, brain MRI scans of 71 children evaluated for epilepsy were analyzed, including 35 MRI-positive patients with suspected FCD and 36 MRI-negative cases based on the primary radiology reports. Both models were applied to standard 3D T1-weighted and 3D FLAIR images. Detected lesions were reviewed by an experienced pediatric neuroradiologist and classified as true positive, false positive, or false negative. Clinical semiology and EEG findings were additionally evaluated for cases with false-positive detections. At the lesion level, MELD Graph achieved a precision of 0.85 and recall of 0.52, while 3D-nnUNet achieved a precision of 0.91 and recall of 0.48. In the MRI-negative patients, MELD Graph produced more false-positive detections than 3D-nnUNet (0.53 vs. 0.14 false-positive lesions per patient). At the patient level, MELD Graph showed slightly higher sensitivity than 3D-nnUNet (0.63 vs. 0.54), whereas 3D-nnUNet demonstrated markedly higher specificity (0.86 vs. 0.56). Improved FLAIR image quality was associated with trends toward improved model performance. Both models demonstrated high precision but moderate sensitivity, indicating that they are valuable decision-support tools but cannot replace expert neuroradiological evaluation. Optimized MRI acquisition protocols are needed to further improve automated lesion detection in pediatric epilepsy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
3
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
8
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
10
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Epilepsia Open
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%