Deep Learning-Based Detection of Focal Cortical Dysplasia in Children: External Validation of the MELD Graph and 3D-nnUNet pipelines
Dell'Orco, A.; De Vita, E.; D'Arco, F.; Lange, A.; Rüber, T.; Kaindl, A. M.; Wattjes, M. P.; Thomale, U. W.; Becker, L.-L.; Tietze, A.
Show abstract
Focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) are one of the most common structural causes of drug-resistant epilepsy in children but are frequently subtle and difficult to detect on conventional MRI. Many automated lesion detection methods have therefore been proposed to support neuroradiological assessment. In this study, we externally validated two recently developed deep-learning approaches for FCD detection, MELD Graph and 3D-nnUNet, in a pediatric cohort. In this retrospective single-center study, brain MRI scans of 71 children evaluated for epilepsy were analyzed, including 35 MRI-positive patients with suspected FCD and 36 MRI-negative cases based on the primary radiology reports. Both models were applied to standard 3D T1-weighted and 3D FLAIR images. Detected lesions were reviewed by an experienced pediatric neuroradiologist and classified as true positive, false positive, or false negative. Clinical semiology and EEG findings were additionally evaluated for cases with false-positive detections. At the lesion level, MELD Graph achieved a precision of 0.85 and recall of 0.52, while 3D-nnUNet achieved a precision of 0.91 and recall of 0.48. In the MRI-negative patients, MELD Graph produced more false-positive detections than 3D-nnUNet (0.53 vs. 0.14 false-positive lesions per patient). At the patient level, MELD Graph showed slightly higher sensitivity than 3D-nnUNet (0.63 vs. 0.54), whereas 3D-nnUNet demonstrated markedly higher specificity (0.86 vs. 0.56). Improved FLAIR image quality was associated with trends toward improved model performance. Both models demonstrated high precision but moderate sensitivity, indicating that they are valuable decision-support tools but cannot replace expert neuroradiological evaluation. Optimized MRI acquisition protocols are needed to further improve automated lesion detection in pediatric epilepsy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of the Temporal Pole in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study 95%
- Fluid and White Matter Suppression Contrasts MRI Improves Deep Learning Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Cortical Lesions 94%
- Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensitively Detects and Accurately Quantifies Multiple Sclerosis Lesions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning-based prediction of motor status in glioma patients using diffusion MRI metrics along the corticospinal tract 93%
- Spinal cord MRI and MRS Detect Early-stage Alterations and Disease Progression in Friedreich Ataxia 92%
- The sequence of regional structural disconnectivity due to multiple sclerosis lesions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 95%
- Evidence of supratentorial white matter injury prior to treatment in children with posterior fossa tumours using diffusion MRI 94%
- Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR-images with age fusion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 95%
- Image processing approaches to enhance perivascular space visibility and quantification using MRI 93%
- An AI-based segmentation and analysis pipeline for high-field MR monitoring of cerebral organoids 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 94%
- Performance of three freely available methods for extracting white matter hyperintensities: FreeSurfer, UBO Detector and BIANCA 93%
- A framework for evaluating correspondence between brain images using anatomical fiducials 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.