Back

On the robustness of ethnic and socio-cultural determinants of healthcare decision-making autonomy among Hausa, Fulani, and Kanuri women in Northern Nigeria.

OGUNETIMOJU, A. M.; AJEBORIOGBON, S. A.

2026-04-22 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351355 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWomens autonomy in healthcare decision-making has become one of the most critical yet inequitably distributed determinants of health outcomes, gender equity, and sustainable development worldwide. In Northern Nigeria, the presence of ethnic and socio-cultural inequality is frequently concealed by the aggregated statistics of a region. MethodsThis cross-sectional secondary analysis utilized the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. The sample included 9,998 married women (15-49 years) identifying as Hausa, Fulani, or Kanuri in Northern Nigeria. Healthcare autonomy was categorized as husband/partner alone, respondent alone, or joint decision-making. Analysis included weighted descriptive statistics, Rao-Scott adjusted chi-square tests for residential associations, and complex sample multinomial logistic regression to identify multivariable correlates while adjusting for sampling weights, strata, and clusters. ResultsMean age was 30.38 years. Most participants lacked formal education (69.6%) and resided in rural areas (72.0%). Husband-only decision-making predominated (72.6%), while 22.5% reported joint and 4.9% independent autonomy. Joint decision-making was significantly higher in urban (33.3%) than rural areas (18.3%; Adjusted F=50.892, p<0.001). In adjusted models (Reference: Kanuri), Hausa and Fulani women had substantially lower odds of joint decision-making relative to husband-only outcomes. Rural residence correlated with lower odds of both independent and joint agency. Notably, wealth status was not a significant predictor after adjustment (p > 0.05). ConclusionsEthnicity and residence are robust determinants of healthcare autonomy among women in Northern Nigeria, persisting regardless of education or wealth. This "socio-cultural paradox" suggests that economic interventions alone are insufficient. Policies must complement socioeconomic approaches with culturally responsive strategies addressing household power dynamics and entrenched social norms.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.3%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
14
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
16
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%