Back

S-Adenosyl-D-methionine as a Non-Physiological Substrate for a Wide Range of SAM-Dependent Enzymes

Germer, P.; Gericke, L.; Koeppl, L.-H.; Zou, Z.; Jockmann, E.; Kuge, M.; Zoller, K.; Herrmann, H.; Fuderer, R.; Mohr, M. K. F.; Bartels, A.; Oral, G.; Lukat, P.; Layer, G.; Mueller, M.; Blankenfeldt, W.; Barra, L.; Andexer, J. N.

2026-04-21 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.20.719600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability of SAM-dependent enzymes to accept S-adenosyl-D-methionine [D-SAM, (SS,RC)-SAM] instead of the native cofactor S-adenosyl-L-methionine [L-SAM, (SS,SC)-SAM] remains largely unexplored. Challenging the stereochemical preference of SAM-dependent enzymes, we investigated the ability of different enzyme classes to accept D-SAM. Contrary to common assumptions, the tested N- and O-methyl transferases (MTs), as well as one of the examined C-MTs accepted D-SAM. Docking studies suggest that acceptance of D-SAM by C-MTs may be influenced by the angle between the transferable methyl group of SAM and the nucleophilic carbon of the substrate, along with enzyme and substrate flexibility. In addition to conventional MTs, the radical SAM glutamine C-MT QCMT showed low but detectable methylation activity with D-SAM. Furthermore, the azetidine-2-carboxylic acid synthase AzeJ not only uses D-SAM but also incorporates the stereocentre of D-methionine into the cyclic amino acid product. The pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme 1-aminocyclopropyl-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACCS) also showed detectable turnover with D-SAM. These findings broaden the understanding of enzyme stereoselectivity, provide an overview of D-SAM-utilising enzymes, and identify first enzyme systems that may serve as starting points for engineering efforts aimed at shifting cofactor preference towards D-SAM.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Catalysis
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
4
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
8
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Natural Products
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
20
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
24
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Metabolic Engineering Communications
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Biochimie
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%