Back

Autoluminescence characteristics of 25 Phalaenopsis orchids following transient transformation with eFBP2

Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; Qiu, J.; Lin, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Du, H.; Xie, T.; Jia, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Ruan, J.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, P.

2026-04-22 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.20.719549 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Engineering autoluminescent plants, especially horticultural crops, has recently emerged as a promising research area, with one current approach involving the transgenic introduction of fungal luciferin biosynthesis genes. Unlike the reported autoluminescent plants--which have small, inconspicuous and short-lived flowers, such as tobacco and petunia--Phalaenopsis orchids are ideal for engineering autoluminescent varieties due to their showy, long-lasting flowers. However, it remains unclear whether all Phalaenopsis orchids would become autoluminescent after being engineered with luciferase genes. Here, aiming to screen for suitable cultivars prior to transgenic experiments, we assess the autoluminescence characteristics of 25 representative Phalaenopsis cultivars after transient eFBP2 transformation, alongside several key morphological and biochemical traits. Our results demonstrate that autoluminescence characteristics are correlated with floral color lightness, organ textures and epidermal cell types. In contrast, the content of the substrates of luciferin--caffeic acid and tyrosine, and the infiltration ease of eFBP2-containing inoculation solution into floral organs after injection, have limited effects on autoluminescence characteristics. Autoluminescence intensity can be reasonably predicted using five floral traits investigated, as 80.4% of variation can be explained by these traits. Our study not only identifies specific Phalaenopsis cultivars with high potential for developing autoluminescent lines but also provides a selection framework applicable to other horticultural crops.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.6%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
5
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
7
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
11
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%