Back

Unlocking a flexible set of phylogenetic models for discrete and continuous trait evolution using discretized stochastic diffusion

Revell, L. J.; Alencar, L. R. V.; Alfaro, M. E.; Dain, J.; Hill, N. J.; Jones, M.; Martinet, K. M.; Romero-Alarcon, V.; Harmon, L. J.

2026-04-21 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.20.719455 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The practical utility of many modern phylogenetic comparative methods can depend on how accurately mathematical models capture the evolutionary process of traits. Boucher and Demery (2016) described a new quantitative trait model, Brownian motion with reflective limits, that they anticipated might be of use in testing hypotheses about a particular sort of constraint on phenotypic character evolution. Since their analytic solution for the probability function under this bounded evolutionary scenario was not practical to evaluate for reasonably-sized trees, Boucher and Demery (2016) also identified a creative technique for computing the likelihood of their model. The basis of this methodology derives from the convergence of an equal-rates, symmetric, ordered Markov chain and continuous stochastic diffusion in the limit as the number of steps in our chain goes to {infty} (or, alternatively, as their widths decrease towards zero). We refer to this convergence in the limit as the discretized diffusion approximation or (more compactly) the discrete approximation. We realized that this discrete approximation of Boucher and Demery (2016) unlocked a number of additional models for the phylogenetic comparative analysis of discrete and continuous trait data, and we explore several of these in the present article. Specifically, we examine application of this discretized diffusion approximation to the threshold model from evolutionary quantitative genetics, to a new "semi-threshold" trait evolution model, to a joint model of discrete and continuous traits in which the discrete trait influences the rate of evolution of our continuous character, as well as a model where precisely the converse is true, and to a discrete character dependent multi-trend trended continuous trait evolution model. We conclude with some context for the origins of our article and discussion of other possible applications of this powerful approach.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
4
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%