Back

Proposed Classification System for the 445 nm Blue Light Laser for Treatment of Laryngeal Lesions

Khan, M.; Islam, A. M.; Abdel-Aty, Y.; Rosow, D.; Mallur, P.; Johns, M.; Rosen, C. A.; Bensoussan, Y. E.

2026-04-22 otolaryngology
10.64898/2026.04.20.26351290 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveOnly preliminary investigations on the use of the 445 nanometer wavelength blue light laser (BLL) for various laryngeal pathologies have been described. Currently, no standard exists for reporting treatment technique and tissue effect with this modality. Here, we aim to establish and validate a classification system to describe laser-induced tissue effects. Study DesignRetrospective video-based study for classification development and reliability validation. MethodsVideo recordings from procedures performed with the BLL by multiple academic laryngologists were retrospectively reviewed. A preliminary 6-point classification (BLL 1-6) was developed based on expert consensus. Thirteen additional procedural clips were independently rated utilizing the classification schema to assess perceived tissue effect, and measure inter- and intra-rate reliability. ResultsThe final 5-point classification system (BLL 1-5) included angiolysis, blanching, tissue vaporization, ablation with mechanical tissue removal, and cutting. The consensus of the combined reviewers in rating all cases was 89% (58 of 65). Complete consensus was not achieved in 11% (7/65) of cases. Of those incorrect, 57% (4/7) were of clips illustrating the BLL-2 classification. Intra-rater reliability amongst the reviewers was 100%. ConclusionTissue effect of the 445 nm blue light laser can reliably be standardized with this proposed classification system. This rating system can be used to facilitate future systematic study of outcomes and effective communication between laryngologists and trainees.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.2%
2
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
9
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
21
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%