Back

Patterns of maternal transport in a state with levels of maternal care and no formal perinatal regions

Li, J.; Steimle, L. N.; Carrel, M.; Byrd, R. A.; Radke, S. M.

2026-04-22 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.20.26351263 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo characterize maternal transport patterns in Iowa, a state with levels of maternal care and without formal perinatal regions, and assess whether transport decisions reflect efficient, risk-appropriate coordination. MethodsWe analyzed 2010-2023 Iowa birth records, which included 2,251 maternal transports between obstetric facilities across 106 unique routes. We characterized transport patterns and applied a community detection algorithm to identify "communities" of obstetric facilities that disproportionately transport among themselves. FindingsSuburban and rural counties have elevated transport rates compared to urban counties. 2,189 transports (97%) were from lower-to higher-level facilities. Among these, 2,037 (93%) were to Level III tertiary care centers. 567 transports (25.2%) bypassed a closer facility offering an equivalent or higher level of care than its destination facility. Health system affiliation was associated with bypassing transport, indicating potential organizational rather than purely geographic drivers of transport decisions. Three "communities" of obstetric facilities largely shaped by geographic proximity were identified. ConclusionsAlthough Iowa does not have formal perinatal regions, patterns of maternal transport are mostly in line with three de facto regions. Some potential inefficiencies were identified, such as obstetric facilities transporting to a farther facility when a closer facility offered the same level of care or higher. These findings may help identify opportunities to enhance care coordination among obstetric facilities, optimize maternal transport networks, and improve regionalization of maternal care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.4%
2
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
4
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
9
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
12
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%