Back

MutaPhy: A clade-based framework to detect genotype-phenotype associations on phylogenetic trees

Ngo, A.; Guindon, S.; Pedergnana, V.

2026-04-21 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.19.719535 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how genetic variation in pathogens influences clinical phenotypes observed in infected hosts is a fundamental challenge in evolutionary genomics and public health. Phenotypic traits such as infection severity are often non-randomly distributed within the pathogens phylogeny, suggesting the existence of evolutionary determinants but also violating the independence assumption underlying classical genome-wide association studies and potentially leading to inflated false positive rates. We present MutaPhy, a phylogeny-based method aimed at detecting correlations between a binary host phenotype and the corresponding pathogen genome by directly utilizing the hierarchical structure of phylogenetic trees. MutaPhy encompasses three different scales: (i) a subtree scale, on which relevant clades over-representing the phenotype of interest are detected using permutation-based tests; (ii) a tree scale, which agglomerates local signals into a global association statistics; and (iii) a site scale, whereby candidate mutational events on branches leading to significant clades are examined using ancestral sequence reconstruction. We evaluate the statistical behavior and detection performance of MutaPhy using simulations under diverse evolutionary scenarios. We also compare this tool to several existing phylogenetic association methods. As illustrative applications, we apply MutaPhy to dengue virus and hepatitis C virus datasets associated to clinical phenotypes in human hosts. Our results highlight the ability of the proposed approach to detect viral lineages associated to over-represented phenotypes while revealing limited evidence for robust mutation-level associations in these particular datasets. Altogether, MutaPhy provides a framework for guiding genotype-phenotype association analyses by leveraging phylogenetic structure, thereby reducing false positive findings and improving the interpretability of association signals.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 1%
22.9%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.6%
3
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
16
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
26
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
28
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
29
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%