Back

intI1 predicts ARGs and human source tracking markers carried by coprophagous flies in Maputo, Mozambique

Heintzman, A. A.; Cumbe, Z. A.; Cumbane, V.; Cumming, O.; Holcomb, D.; Keenum, I.; Knee, J.; Monteiro, V.; Nala, R.; Brown, J.; Capone, D.

2026-04-21 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.04.19.26351253 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wastewater surveillance is increasingly used for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) monitoring in urban environments, but low-resource settings often lack a piped sewerage system. Instead, coprophagous flies--flies that ingest feces--may serve as composite samplers for monitoring fecal wastes present in terrestrial environments. We evaluated whether the class 1 integron-integrase gene intI1 was associated with genetic markers of AMR and fecal source tracking markers (FST) in coprophagous flies collected from latrine entrances and food preparation areas in low-income urban Maputo, Mozambique. We quantified intI1, an enteric 16S rRNA target (for normalization), three FST markers, and 30 ARG targets using qPCR. We normalized concentrations of intI1 and each target to enteric 16S rRNA. We fit linear mixed models with a random intercept for housing compound to estimate within-fly associations between log10 relative abundance of intI1 and log10 relative abundance of each target with and without adjustment for fly taxonomic group, capture location, and standardized fly mass. We also modeled per-fly unique ARG count (i.e., number of ARG targets detected) using Poisson regression. Of 188 flies assayed, 176 passed internal controls; intI1 and enteric 16S rRNA were detected in 95% and 96% of flies, respectively. Higher relative abundance of intI1 was positively associated with ARG and FST targets, with the strongest associations observed for sulfonamide-(sul1: {beta} = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81, 0.94; sul2: {beta} = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.89), tetracycline- (tetA: {beta} = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.85; tetB: {beta} = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.79), and trimethoprim-related (dfrA17: {beta} = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.86) genes. Associations with FST markers were weaker (i.e., human mtDNA: {beta} = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.55; human-associated Bacteroides: {beta} = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.43). Higher relative abundance of intI1 was also associated with a greater number of ARGs detected: each 10-fold increase in intI1 was associated with an 8% higher expected unique ARG count (aRR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12). These findings support the need for further research across different settings exploring intI1 carried by coprophagous flies as a potential standardized screening target for AMR surveillance in unsewered terrestrial environments.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
3
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
19
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
21
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%