Back

Decision Curve Analysis for Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Next-Day Transfer Out of ICU

Pozo, M.; Pape, A.; Locke, B.; Pettine, W. W.

2026-04-21 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.19.26351213 medRxiv
Show abstract

Timely identification of intensive care unit (ICU) patients likely to exit the unit can support anticipatory workflows such as chart review, eligibility screening, and patient outreach prior to transfer. Most ICU discharge prediction studies report discrimination and calibration, but these metrics do not quantify the decision consequences of acting on predictions. Using adult ICU admissions from MIMIC-IV, we represented each ICU stay as a sequence of daily clinical summaries and trained logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models to predict next day ICU transfer. Models achieved ROC AUC of 0.80-0.84 with differing calibration. We evaluated decision utility using decision curve analysis (DCA), where positive predictions trigger proactive review. Across thresholds, model guided strategies outperformed review-all, review-none, and a simple clinical rule. To translate net benefit into implementable operations, we modeled a clinical trial recruitment workflow with an 8 hour daily time constraint, incorporating chart review and consent effort. At a feasible operating threshold (0.23), the model flagged [~]23 charts/day and yielded [~]1.23 enrollments/day under conservative eligibility and consent assumptions. These results demonstrate that DCA provides a transparent framework for determining when ICU transfer predictions are worth using and how thresholds should be selected to align with real world workflow constraints. Data and Code AvailabilityThis research has been conducted using data from MIMIC-IV. Researchers can request access via PhysioNet. Implementation code is available upon request.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.4%
3
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
5
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.2%
10
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
16
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%