Decision Curve Analysis for Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Next-Day Transfer Out of ICU
Pozo, M.; Pape, A.; Locke, B.; Pettine, W. W.
Show abstract
Timely identification of intensive care unit (ICU) patients likely to exit the unit can support anticipatory workflows such as chart review, eligibility screening, and patient outreach prior to transfer. Most ICU discharge prediction studies report discrimination and calibration, but these metrics do not quantify the decision consequences of acting on predictions. Using adult ICU admissions from MIMIC-IV, we represented each ICU stay as a sequence of daily clinical summaries and trained logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models to predict next day ICU transfer. Models achieved ROC AUC of 0.80-0.84 with differing calibration. We evaluated decision utility using decision curve analysis (DCA), where positive predictions trigger proactive review. Across thresholds, model guided strategies outperformed review-all, review-none, and a simple clinical rule. To translate net benefit into implementable operations, we modeled a clinical trial recruitment workflow with an 8 hour daily time constraint, incorporating chart review and consent effort. At a feasible operating threshold (0.23), the model flagged [~]23 charts/day and yielded [~]1.23 enrollments/day under conservative eligibility and consent assumptions. These results demonstrate that DCA provides a transparent framework for determining when ICU transfer predictions are worth using and how thresholds should be selected to align with real world workflow constraints. Data and Code AvailabilityThis research has been conducted using data from MIMIC-IV. Researchers can request access via PhysioNet. Implementation code is available upon request.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalizing renal replacement therapy initiation in the intensive care unit: a reinforcement learning-based strategy with external validation on the AKIKI randomized controlled trials 94%
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 94%
- Clinical Utility of Automatable Prediction Models for Improving Palliative and End-Of-Life Care Outcomes: Towards Routine Decision Analysis Before Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Generalizability Across Healthcare Settings: Insights from multi-site COVID-19 screening 94%
- A comprehensive ML-based Respiratory Monitoring System for Physiological Monitoring & Resource Planning in the ICU 93%
- GLUCOSE: A Distributional Reinforcement Learning Model for Optimal Glucose Control After Cardiac Surgery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 95%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 94%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 94%
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 94%
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Intensive Care Unit Resource Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.