Back

Digital Therapeutic for Hwa-byung Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Pilot Feasibility Trial

Kwon, C.-Y.; Lee, B.; Kim, M.; Mun, J.-h.; Seo, M.-G.; Yoon, D.

2026-04-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.19.26351203 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHwa-byung (HB) is a Korean culture-bound syndrome characterised by prolonged suppression of anger and somatic complaints. No evidence-based digital therapeutic (DTx) has been developed for HB. We evaluated the feasibility, user experience (UX), and preliminary clinical effect of an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based DTx application, Hwa-free, for HB. MethodsAdults aged 19-80 years diagnosed with HB were enrolled in a four-week app-based intervention with assessment at baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, and Week 8 follow-up. The primary outcome was UX assessed via a 22-item survey at Week 4. Secondary outcomes included HB-related symptom and personality scales, depression, anxiety, anger expression, psychological flexibility, health-related quality of life, and heart rate variability. ResultsOf 45 screened, 30 were enrolled and 28 constituted the modified intention-to-treat population. Mean app use was 19.9 {+/-} 7.9 days (71.2% adherence over 28 days). Adverse events were infrequent and unrelated to the intervention. Positive response rates exceeded 80% for video content (items 2-4: 82.8-89.7%), HB self-assessment (86.2%), meditation therapy (86.2%), and in-app guidance (85.7%). Pre-post improvements from baseline to Week 4 were observed in 11 of 18 clinical scales, including HB Symptom Scale ({Delta} = -9.8, Cohens d = -0.92), Beck Depression Inventory-II ({Delta} = -13.3, d = -1.11), and state anger ({Delta} = -7.8, d = -0.96). The HB screening-positive rate declined from 100% at baseline to 55.6% at Week 8. ConclusionsHwa-free demonstrated adequate feasibility, acceptable UX, and preliminary evidence of clinically meaningful improvement in HB-related symptoms. Future randomised controlled trial is warranted. Trial registrationCRIS, KCT0011105

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
5
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
11
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
13
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
17
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%