Back

A long-read RNA sequencing and polysome profiling framework reveals transposable element-driven transcript diversity and translational rewiring in glioblastoma

Pizzagalli, M.; Sasipalli, S.; Leary, O.; Tran, L.; Haas, B.; Tapinos, N.

2026-04-21 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.18.719388 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTransposable elements (TEs) account for over half of the human genome and are often derepressed in cancer. TEs can add cryptic splice sites, undergo exonization, and generate gene-TE fusion transcripts, but the combined effects of TEs on RNA processing and translation in glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) remains incompletely elucidated. ResultsWe combined long-read RNA sequencing with polysome profiling in four patient-derived GSCs and two neural stem cell (NSC) controls to resolve TE-associated transcript diversity and its relationship to ribosomal engagement. Across GSCs, we identified 13,421 alternative splicing (AS) events, 3,077 of which contained TEs within 150 bp of splice junctions. AS sites proximal to TEs were associated with increased isoform switching compared to non-TE-associated AS sites (odds ratio 2.9 - 4.3). Moreover, AS isoforms generated from TE-proximal sites were more likely to exhibit altered ribosomal association (odds ratio 2.54). Directional shifts were observed, with shorter isoforms associating with monosome fractions and longer isoforms with polysome fractions. To enable systematic detection of gene - TE chimeric transcripts, we developed FuTER (Fusion TE Reporter), a long-read-based framework for identifying TE-associated fusions. Application to GSC datasets identified 78 GSC enriched fusion transcripts, several supported by breakpoint-spanning reads in polysome fractions, consistent with ribosome association. ConclusionsOur data suggest that TEs correlate with abnormal splicing activity and altered ribosome engagement in glioblastoma stem cells. By integrating long-read sequencing with polysome profiling and fusion detection, we establish a framework for analysis of TE-induced transcript diversity and its effects on cancer evolution and plasticity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.1%
3
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
6
Mobile DNA
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
11
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
21
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
25
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%