Back

A Pilot Study on the Urinary Microbiome Composition and Diversity in Clinical UTI Samples: A 16S rRNA Analysis

Almamoori, A. A.; Farhan, M. H.; Al-Khafaji, N.; Al_Rahhal, A.

2026-04-19 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.18.719336 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This pilot study assessed the composition and diversity of the urinary microbiome from clinically confirmed UTI samples using 16S rRNA sequencing, whilst also exploring inter-individual variability of microbial community structure. We examined ten urine samples from patients with culture-positive UTIs. Demographic and clinical metadata, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes status and recent antibiotic exposure was recorded per sample. Metagenomic DNA was extracted from microbial samples and sequenced to generate genus-level taxonomic profiling through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Relative abundance tables were generated for each of the samples to identify dominant bacterial genera within each sample and summarize cohort level microbial patterns. To evaluate within-sample richness and evenness, alpha diversity indices (Shannon, Simpson, observed features and Chao1) were computed; beta diversity was measured using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity with principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) for graphical representation. The studys findings revealed the sex and moderate clinical diversity of the study sample; all samples were confirmed as having been taken from a UTI patient and exhibited a wide level of heterogeneity regarding the microbial composition of each urine sample. Overall, Pseudomonas was the dominant genus present, however, specific samples had approximately 50% of their microbiomes composed of Klebsiella, Proteus, and Escherichia species as well as approximately 25% of their total microbes were made up of Burkholderia spp., which are closely related to the genus of interest used during the course of this study. The observed alpha diversity of each sample displayed considerable variation for the included samples with a continuum of samples ranging from a single dominant microbe to a highly diverse mixed population producing a highly diverse polymicrobial population/bacterial composition, with some ratios of individual taxa to collective taxa of many samples repeatedly illustrating the exact nature of the specimen. Furthermore, a significant degree of Beta diversity was found between the patients, providing compelling evidence of identifiable differences among urinary microbiomes between patients with UTI. This pilot project provides a clear indication of the diversity and overall heterogeneity of urinary microbiota found in the UTI patients studied. In addition, the results of this study support the notion that the ecological complexities present within a urinary microbiome cannot necessarily be established through conventional culture methods, and that combined with molecular techniques such as 16S rRNA sequencing of bacterial DNA could be used to quantify and characterize the ecologic condition of urinary microbiota separate from the traditional high prevalence of identifiable uropathogens.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
3
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
5
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
9
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
10
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
12
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
17
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
19
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
29
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%