Back

Interpretable AI for Accelerated Video-Based Surgical Skill Assessment: A Highlights-Reel Approach

Lafouti, M.; Feldman, L. S.; Hooshiar, A.

2026-04-20 medical education
10.64898/2026.04.18.26351193 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundManual video-based evaluation of surgical skills can be time-consuming and delays trainee feedback. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities to automate aspects of assessment while maintaining clinician oversight. We developed an interpretable spatiotemporal model that classifies surgical expertise directly from endoscopic video in standardized training tasks and generates saliency-based "highlights reels" showing the most influential frames. MethodsAn RGB pipeline combining InceptionV3 for spatial feature extraction and a gated recurrent unit (GRU) for temporal modeling was trained on the JIGSAWS dataset. The model outputs novice, intermediate, or expert labels. A rolling-window, low-latency evaluation at 30 fps with a stride of 10 frames was used. A motion-augmented variant fused RGB with optical-flow features. Spatial and temporal saliency maps highlighted key decision-making regions. ResultsThe RGB model achieved 95% accuracy (F1: 92% expert, 86% intermediate, 99% novice). Performance was strongest for novice and expert trials, while intermediate trials showed the lowest recall, consistent with greater ambiguity around the intermediate skill level. Saliency maps consistently emphasized tool-tissue interactions and peaked during technically demanding phases. The optical-flow variant underperformed, approximately 38% accuracy, which may reflect sensitivity to global camera motion and other non-informative motion patterns. ConclusionsThis interpretable AI pipeline accurately classifies surgical skill while producing intuitive visual highlights. Future work will refine highlight thresholds and validate on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for realworld deployment.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.2%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
15
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
20
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%