Back

Trial protocol: RadTARGET, a multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating focal radiotherapy boost with de-intensification of dose to non-suspicious prostate in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer

Dornisch, A.; Rojo Domingo, M.; Alexander, R. V.; Conlin, C. C.; Do, S.; McKay, R. R.; Moiseenko, V.; Liss, M. A.; Liu, J.; Pawlicki, T.; Pena, S.; Qiao, E. M.; Rose, B. S.; Rupareliya, R.; Sandhu, A. P.; Scholey, J.; Seyedin, S. N.; Urbanic, J. J.; Wei, L.-J.; Seibert, T. M.

2026-04-20 urology
10.64898/2026.04.18.26351182 medRxiv
Show abstract

Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) with dose intensification and/or focal boosting has excellent oncologic outcomes, but many patients experience adverse events. Dose escalation to the whole prostate improves outcomes at the expense of increased late adverse events. Intraprostatic recurrence after definitive RT typically occurs at the site of the primary tumor, suggesting that dose to the site of the dominant lesion is an important predictor of future failure. The efficacy and safety of tumor-focused RT compared to that of standard RT for definitive treatment of localized PC has not been assessed. RadTARGET (RAdiation Dose TAiloRing Guided by Enhanced Targeting) is a phase II randomized trial that aims to demonstrate superior safety of image-guided, tumor-focused RT compared to standard RT for acute genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) in the setting of definitive RT for intermediate- and high-risk PC. The study intervention is image-guided, tumor-focused RT with dose intensification of cancer visible on imaging and dose de-intensification to remaining prostate. Patients will be randomized to two arms: those who receive standard RT dose and those that receive tumor-focused RT. The study population will be patients with intermediate- or high-risk PC planning to undergo definitive RT with or without systemic therapy. The primary endpoint to compare between randomized arms is acute GU or GI grade [≥]2 adverse events. Participant and study duration are 5 years and 8 years, respectively. RadTARGET will compare the efficacy and safety of tumor-focused RT to that of standard RT for definitive treatment of localized PC. We hypothesize that the tumor-focused approach will substantially reduce adverse events after prostate RT while retaining high efficacy. If this hypothesis is confirmed, we will conclude that a phase III randomized control trial is warranted to formally establish oncologic non-inferiority compared to the current standard of whole-gland dose escalation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
3
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
7
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.2%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
11
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
13
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
17
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%