Trial protocol: RadTARGET, a multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating focal radiotherapy boost with de-intensification of dose to non-suspicious prostate in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer
Dornisch, A.; Rojo Domingo, M.; Alexander, R. V.; Conlin, C. C.; Do, S.; McKay, R. R.; Moiseenko, V.; Liss, M. A.; Liu, J.; Pawlicki, T.; Pena, S.; Qiao, E. M.; Rose, B. S.; Rupareliya, R.; Sandhu, A. P.; Scholey, J.; Seyedin, S. N.; Urbanic, J. J.; Wei, L.-J.; Seibert, T. M.
Show abstract
Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) with dose intensification and/or focal boosting has excellent oncologic outcomes, but many patients experience adverse events. Dose escalation to the whole prostate improves outcomes at the expense of increased late adverse events. Intraprostatic recurrence after definitive RT typically occurs at the site of the primary tumor, suggesting that dose to the site of the dominant lesion is an important predictor of future failure. The efficacy and safety of tumor-focused RT compared to that of standard RT for definitive treatment of localized PC has not been assessed. RadTARGET (RAdiation Dose TAiloRing Guided by Enhanced Targeting) is a phase II randomized trial that aims to demonstrate superior safety of image-guided, tumor-focused RT compared to standard RT for acute genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) in the setting of definitive RT for intermediate- and high-risk PC. The study intervention is image-guided, tumor-focused RT with dose intensification of cancer visible on imaging and dose de-intensification to remaining prostate. Patients will be randomized to two arms: those who receive standard RT dose and those that receive tumor-focused RT. The study population will be patients with intermediate- or high-risk PC planning to undergo definitive RT with or without systemic therapy. The primary endpoint to compare between randomized arms is acute GU or GI grade [≥]2 adverse events. Participant and study duration are 5 years and 8 years, respectively. RadTARGET will compare the efficacy and safety of tumor-focused RT to that of standard RT for definitive treatment of localized PC. We hypothesize that the tumor-focused approach will substantially reduce adverse events after prostate RT while retaining high efficacy. If this hypothesis is confirmed, we will conclude that a phase III randomized control trial is warranted to formally establish oncologic non-inferiority compared to the current standard of whole-gland dose escalation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Re-irradiation to the Prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive Radiotherapy – A systematic review and Meta-analysis of recent trials 95%
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- LITE SABR M1: a Phase I Trial of Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Large Tumors 96%
- Precision association of lymphatic disease spread with radiation-associated toxicity in oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas 94%
- Artificial Intelligence Uncertainty Quantification in Radiotherapy Applications - A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 96%
- Contralateral Neck Recurrence Rates After Ipsilateral Neck Adjuvant Radiation in Head and Neck Carcinomas with a Pathologically Negative Contralateral Neck 95%
- FLASH Radiotherapy Mitigates Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia and Prevents Immunosuppression via Chk1-STAT3 Axis Modulation in a Preclinical Thoracic Irradiation Model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 92%
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 91%
- Selumetinib in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory RAS-pathway mutated paediatric and adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (SeluDex): study protocol for an international, parallel-group, dose-finding with expansion phase I/II trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human Papilloma Virus Circulating Cell-Free DNA Kinetics in Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation 93%
- PSMA+ Extracellular Vesicles are a Biomarker for SABR in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Analysis from the STOMP-like and ORIOLE trial cohorts 91%
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.