Back

Evaluation of Neuronal Activation Thresholds for Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Exposure Using Morphologically Realistic Neuron Models

Gazquez, J.; Camacho Cadena, C.; He, W.; Yamada, E.; Altekoester, C.; Soyka, F.; Laakso, I.; Hirata, A.; Joseph, W.; Tarnaud, T.; Tanghe, E.

2026-04-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.17.719188 bioRxiv
Show abstract

International guidelines for low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure (LF EMF) are primarily intended to prevent substantiated adverse effects. In the frameworks, limits on internal electric fields are linked to external exposure levels through computational dosimetry. However, the relationship between internal electric fields and these adverse effects remains incompletely understood. In particular, current approaches often overlook the morphological complexity and diversity of cortical neurons, which may limit the realism of neuronal activation estimates used to support these assessments. This study evaluates LF EMF-induced neural activation using 25 morphologically realistic neuron models spanning all cortical layers, embedded within 11 detailed human head models. The internal electric fields were simulated for uniform magnetic field exposures (100 Hz-100 kHz) along the three anatomical directions, and excitation thresholds were computed using a multi-scale framework combining voxel-based dosimetry with biophysical neuron simulations. A real-world exposure scenario involving a child near an acousto-magnetic article-surveillance deactivator was also analyzed. Thresholds varied across cell type, morphology, cortical location, subject anatomy, frequency, and exposure direction, with L2/3 pyramidal, L4 basket, and L5 thick-tufted pyramidal cells showing the lowest thresholds. Despite this variability, all simulated thresholds were conservative with respect to the basic restrictions and dosimetric reference limits set by IEEE ICES and ICNIRP. The smallest margin occurred at 100 kHz, where the threshold remained a factor of 2.8 above the corresponding limit. These findings indicate that current LF EMF exposure limits remain conservative when evaluated using highly detailed, morphology-based CNS activation models.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.8%
3
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
8
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
15
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%