Back

3D Reconstruction of Nanoparticle Distribution in Tumor Spheroids with Volume Electron Microscopy

Bottone, D.; Gerken, L. R.; Habermann, S.; Mateos, J. M.; Lucas, M. S.; Riemann, J.; Fachet, M.; Resch-Genger, U.; Kissling, V. M.; Roesslein, M.; Gogos, A.; Herrmann, I. K.

2026-04-21 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.17.719153 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWSpatially resolved characterization of nanomaterial (NM) distribution within cellular ultrastructure is essential for understanding NM fate and activity in biological systems. Volume electron microscopy (vEM) is uniquely positioned to address this challenge, yet fully documented quantitative pipelines that simultaneously segment NMs and cellular structures remain scarce. Here, an end-to-end analytical pipeline is presented based on the example of serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) data of tumor spheroids containing nanoparticles (NPs). A hybrid segmentation strategy is adopted: a fine-tuned Cellpose-SAM model for cells and nuclei, and an empirical Bayes approach for AuNPs. The fine-tuned model outperforms both the pre-trained baseline and benchmark experiments in Amira, and shows good generalization to 2D EM datasets of varying sample types, suggesting potential as a general-purpose segmentation model for electron microscopy. Full 3D reconstruction of NP distributions reveals preferential clustering in the perinuclear region, with a median nucleus-to-NP distance of 2.57 {micro}m and NM uptake spanning several orders of magnitude across cells. Furthermore, morphological analysis of segmented cells and nuclei using 3D shape descriptors and local curvature metrics provides quantitative access to features inaccessible from single sections. Together, these results establish a reproducible, open framework for the joint quantitative analysis of NM distribution and cellular morphology in vEM data.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.5%
2
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
4
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
16
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
23
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
26
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%