Back

Daily feeding rhythms may play a role in the genetic variability of feed efficiency in growing pigs

Gilbert, H.; Foury, A.; Agboola, L.; Devailly, G.; Gondret, F.; Moisan, M.-P.

2026-04-21 zoology
10.64898/2026.04.17.719142 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWImproving feed efficiency in pigs is essential for reducing production costs and environmental impacts. This study examines the influence of circadian feeding rhythms and genetic polymorphisms on feed efficiency variability using two pig lines divergently selected for Residual Feed Intake (RFI) over ten generations. Feeding behavior was monitored using automatic concentrate dispensers, recording 6,494,097 visits from 3,824 pigs to analyze meal frequency, duration, and diurnal patterns. LRFI pigs ate less frequently, with larger meals and longer durations, they exhibited two distinct feeding peaks: one around 8:00 AM and a higher one at 5:00 PM and they consumed more feed during the diurnal period and less at night. HRFI pigs showed a smoother, less rhythmic feeding behavior with increased nocturnal intake. The differences between the two RFI lines became more pronounced as the number of generations of selection increased, suggesting a genetic basis. Feeding behaviors, including intake during the two main diurnal peaks, were found to be heritable (heritability estimates: 0.30-0.40) and genetic correlations were observed between feed intake and RFI, especially for intake between the two peaks. Then, we investigated the evolution of allele frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA sequences surrounding 10 core clock genes (ARNTL, CLOCK, CRY1, CRY2, NPAS2, NR1D1, PER1, PER2, PER3, RORA) along generations of selection. SNPs with significant frequency changes were mapped to regulatory regions and transposable elements, especially in HRFI line, suggesting potential functional impacts on circadian regulation. These results underscore the role of feeding behavior and genetic variation in feed efficiency, offering insights for breeding programs aimed at improving metabolic efficiency and sustainability in pig production.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
40.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
8
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%