Back

Beyond Doppler: Scalable AI Detection of LVOT Obstruction in HCM

Crystal, O.; Farina, J. M. M.; Scalia, I. G.; Ayoub, C.; Park, H.-B.; Kim, K. A.; Arsanjani, R.; Lester, S. J.; Banerjee, I.

2026-04-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.17.26351151 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccurate assessment of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients is critical for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) management, yet Doppler-based measurements are technically demanding and require expertise. ObjectiveTo develop a multi-view deep learning model capable of classifying LVOT obstruction (> 20mmHg) using routine 2D echocardiographic windows without reliance on Doppler imaging. MethodsWe trained and externally validated a cross-attention-based video-to-video fusion framework that integrated EchoPrime-derived video representations from three standard transthoracic echocardiographic views to classify LVOT gradients. ResultsTraining was performed on a derivation cohort (N = 1833) from a tertiary care system in the United States, with model performance evaluated on an internal held-out test set (N = 275) and a Korean external validation cohort (N = 46). Single-view baselines showed limited discrimination (external AUROCs 0.47-0.70). Conversely, domain-specific foundational model (EchoPrime) achieved superior single-view performance (AUROCs 0.75-0.80 internal; 0.79-0.83 external), highlighting the importance of echo-specific pretraining and temporal modeling. The proposed multi-view fusion further enhanced predictive performance, with the late fusion model reaching an AUROC of 0.84 on the external cohort with significant population-shift. ConclusionsThese results suggest LVOT physiology is encoded in routine 2D imaging and can be leveraged for clinically relevant gradient classification without Doppler input- proposed AI-guided strategy demonstrates substantial cost savings compared with the screen-all approach. By integrating complementary spatial-temporal information across multiple views, our approach generalizes robustly across populations and may enable real-time decision support, extend LVOT assessment to portable or resource-limited settings, and complement Doppler-based evaluation for longitudinal HCM management.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.9%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.2%
4
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.9%
5
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
17
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
19
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
30
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%