Back

Tongue swab-based Targeted Universal Tuberculosis Testing in people living with HIV in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Olson, A. M.; Wood, R. C.; Sithole, N.; Govender, I.; Grant, A. D.; Smit, T.; David, A.; Stevens, W.; Scott, L.; Drain, P. K.; Cangelosi, G. A.; Shapiro, A. E.

2026-04-25 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.17.26351084 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Targeted Universal Tuberculosis Testing (TUTT) may increase tuberculosis (TB) case detection by including people who are not actively seeking TB care but are at high risk of the disease. Non-invasive tongue swab (TS) testing may facilitate TUTT. We evaluated two TS testing protocols in people with HIV (PWH) tested irrespective of TB symptoms. Methods. Study staff collected Copan FLOQSwab and Medline foam swab specimens, alongside urine and sputa, from PWH, most of whom were presenting for antiretroviral therapy initiation at primary healthcare clinics in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. FLOQSwabs were tested by sequence-specific magnetic capture (SSMaC) with qPCR (FLOQSwab-SSMaC). Foam swabs were tested by centrifuge-sedimentation and high-volume qPCR (foam-sedimentation). Urine lipoarabinomannan was detected using LF-LAM. The extended microbiological reference standard (eMRS) comprised any positive result on Xpert Ultra and/or liquid culture of sputum. Results. We enrolled 251 participants (median age 34 years, 56% female, 67% with self-reported TB symptoms). Participants had a median CD4 count of 347 cells/ul, and 16% (40/251) had prior TB. FLOQSwab-SSMaC was 43% sensitive (13/30) and 100% specific (131/131) relative to eMRS. Foam-sedimentation was 47% (9/29) sensitive and 100% (176/176) specific. Sensitivity increased to 52% (FLOQSwab-SSMaC) and 50% (foam-sedimentation) when sputum Xpert Ultra Trace positive results were excluded from eMRS. TS was more sensitive than urine LAM, and both sample types were more sensitive when CD4 counts were below 200. Discussion. TS testing detected about half of PWH with TB and outperformed urine LAM within this population, including among PWH with low CD4 counts.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.0%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.0%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
5
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
7
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
27
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%