Generalizable Deep Learning Framework for Radiotherapy Dose Prediction Across Cancer Sites, Prescriptions and Treatment Modalities
Chang, H.-h.; Cardan, R.; Nedunoori, R.; Fiveash, J.; Popple, R.; Bodduluri, S.; Stanley, D. N.; Harms, J.; Cardenas, C.
Show abstract
Optimizing radiotherapy dose distributions remain a resource-intensive bottleneck. Existing AI-based dose prediction methods often have limited generalizability because they rely on small, heterogeneous datasets. We present nnDoseNetv2, an auto-configured, end-to-end framework for dose prediction across diverse disease sites (head and neck, prostate, breast, and lung), prescription levels (1.5-84 Gy), and treatment modalities (IMRT, VMAT, and 3D-CRT). By integrating machine-specific beam geometry with 3D structural information, the framework is designed to generalize across varied clinical scenarios. A single multi-site model was trained on 1,000 clinical plans. On sites seen during training, performance was comparable to specialized site-specific models. On unseen sites (liver and whole brain), the model outperformed site-specific models, with mean absolute errors of 2.46% and 6.97% of prescription, respectively. These results suggest that geometric awareness can bridge disparate anatomical domains while eliminating the need for site-specific model maintenance, providing a scalable and high-fidelity approach for personalized radiotherapy planning.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of inverse treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery using fMRI brain activation maps as organs at risk 95%
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 94%
- Cell lines of the same anatomic site and histologic type show large variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity and relative biological effectiveness to protons and carbon ions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Precise dose verification in proton therapy using Positron Emission Tomography. 94%
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm 93%
- Development of a Coupled Simulation Toolkit for Computational Radiation Biology Based on Geant4 and CompuCell3D 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cluster-Based Toxicity Estimation of Osteoradionecrosis via Unsupervised Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Single Dose-Parameter Normal Tissue Complication Probability by Using Whole Dose-Volume Histograms for Cohort Risk Stratification 97%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 95%
- Initial Feasibility and Clinical Implementation of Daily MR-guided Adaptive Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy on a 1.5T MR-Linac System: Prospective R-IDEAL 2a/2b Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recent advances in the clinical applications of machine learning in proton therapy 97%
- Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality 92%
- Biophysical modeling of the electric field magnitude and distribution induced by electrical stimulation with intracerebral electrodes 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 92%
- Development of a High-Performance Multiparametric MRI Oropharyngeal Primary Tumor Auto-Segmentation Deep Learning Model and Investigation of Input Channel Effects: Results from a Prospective Imaging Registry 91%
- Personalized volume-deescalated elective nodal irradiation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (DeEscO): a study protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.