Translation, Validation, and Application of Indonesian Genetic Literacy Questionnaires for Medical Students
Kemal, R. A.; Dhani, R.; Simanjuntak, A. M.; Rafles, A. I.; Triani, H. X.; Rahmi, T. M.; Akbar, V. A.; Firdaus, F.; Pratama, B. F.; Zulharman, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundIncreasing relevance of genetics and molecular biology in medicine necessitates greater genetic literacy among current and future healthcare workers. To assess the literacy level, a validated genetic literacy questionnaire is needed. Therefore, a standardised Indonesian-language genetic literacy questionnaire is essential. AimsWe aimed to translate and validate three genetic literacy questionnaires (PUGGS, iGLAS, and UNC-GKS) for use among Indonesian medical students. We then evaluated genetic literacy levels using one of the validated questionnaires. MethodsThe PUGGS, iGLAS, and UNC-GKS questionnaires were translated into Indonesian and then reviewed by an expert panel for translational accuracy and conceptual appropriateness. Back-translation was performed to confirm validity. Initial Indonesian versions of the questionnaires underwent cognitive pre-testing with 12 undergraduate medical students. After refinements, the questionnaires were validated among 34 first-to third-year medical students. The Indonesian version of UNC-GKS questionnaire was then used to assess genetic literacy of 486 medical students comprising 228 preclinical medical students, 187 clerkships, and 71 residents. ResultsThe Indonesian versions of PUGGS (Cronbachs = 0.819) and UNC-GKS ( = 0.809) demonstrated good reliability, while iGLAS showed poor reliability ( = 0.315). Among the 486 students tested, 56% demonstrated moderate overall genetic literacy, and only 15.2% demonstrated good overall literacy. Basic genetic concepts were relatively well-understood with 54.3% having good literacy. On the contrary, gene variants effects on health were poorly understood with only 9.7% having good literacy. Inheritance concepts were moderately understood with 24.9% having good literacy. ConclusionThe Indonesian translations of PUGGS and UNC-GKS are reliable tools for assessing genetic literacy among medical students. Using UNC-GKS, we observed predominantly moderate genetic literacy levels. Curriculum improvement to better integrate genetics education is essential to support its clinical applications. PRACTICE POINTSO_LIGenetic literacy is needed to fully utilize genetic and genomic application in medicine. C_LIO_LIAdaptation of PUGGS and UNC-GKS genetic literacy questionnaires into Indonesian language resulted in valid and reliable questionnaires to assess genetic literacy among medical students C_LIO_LIModerate genetic literacy level indicates the need for genetics curriculum update in medical schools in Indonesia, especially in the area of gene variants effect on health C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 94%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 93%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: a nationwide cross-sectional study 94%
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 93%
- Factors Influencing Precision Medicine Knowledge and Attitudes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 94%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 92%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 92%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 91%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.