Back

Enhanced Viral Detection in Grapevine via Exome Depletion and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

Cuello, R. A.; Zavallo, D.; Vera, P.; Sattler, A.; Puebla, A. F.; Debat, H. J.; Gomez Talquenca, S.; asurmendi, s.

2026-04-20 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.16.718969 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is highly prone to viral infections that pose a significant threat to global viticulture sustainability. Traditional detection methods, such as PCR and ELISA, are limited to well-known pathogens, highlighting the need for more comprehensive and unbiased approaches. Here, we present the development of a cost-effective viral enrichment system adapted to next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the detection and characterization of grapevine viruses. Our strategy leverages hybridization-based capture using biotin-labeled cDNA probes hereafter named "Chloro-Zero") designed to selectively deplete highly abundant host transcripts particularly plastid and ribosomal RNAs while preserving viral RNA. Probe design was informed by transcriptomic analysis of V. vinifera. We evaluated different subtractor-to-target RNA ratios, observing a consistent reduction of host RNA and a moderate enrichment of viral sequences. NGS analysis revealed improved recovery of low-abundance viral transcripts, with coverage levels comparable, to a certain extent, to those obtained using previously available commercial kits, but at a significantly lower cost. Although variability in depletion efficiency was observed, the results demonstrate the potential of this scalable and locally adaptable protocol for virome profiling in grapevines. By addressing key limitations of current depletion methods, our approach facilitates the detection of emerging viral threats and supports the development of more effective certification programs and sustainable management practices. Ongoing improvements in probe design and bioinformatic workflows are expected to enhance performance, providing a robust platform for broader applications in plant virology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
3
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
14
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
17
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%