Back

Can coastal plantation forests substitute for natural coastal forests as bird and plant habitat? A test across coastal zonation

KITAZAWA, M.; ICHIKAWA, S.; AOKI, D.; SENZAKI, M.

2026-04-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.16.718952 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Natural forests are increasingly being replaced by plantation forests, highlighting an urgent need to reconcile forest use and biodiversity conservation. Coastal forests serve as refugia for species of conservation concern, but they have been globally replaced by plantations, and conversion remains ongoing. As natural coastal forests become increasingly scarce, opportunities for direct biodiversity comparisons with coastal plantations are also disappearing. This scarcity leads to underestimation of the conservation value of natural coastal forests, while effective management measures to conserve biodiversity within coastal plantations remain poorly developed. By focusing on the largest natural coastal forests in Japan, we assessed whether plantation coastal forests can substitute for natural coastal habitats across multiple taxonomic groups, functional groups, and threatened species. We found that plantations supported bird species richness comparable to natural forests at the community level and for threatened species. Surveyed plantation forests supported 7% of global breeding populations of the endangered Brown Shrike. However, plantations hosted lower forest plant species and higher introduced plant species richness. Plantations also significantly altered coastal zonation patterns in plant communities: forest species distribution shifted seaward, whereas coastal and introduced species shifted landward. Coastal plantations are unlikely to be complete substitutes for natural coastal forests for plant species, yet still have the potential for restoring historically lost coastal forest ecosystems. Confining further plantation activities to landward areas and plantations with low canopy cover will mitigate the negative impacts of plantations and further conserve unique coastal communities where forest and grassland species can coexist. Highlight{checkmark} Coastal forests have been historically disturbed and converted to plantations {checkmark}We test whether coastal plantations can substitute for natural forests across taxa {checkmark}Bird species richness in plantations was comparable to that in natural forests {checkmark}Plant species richness was lower in plantations and zonation patterns were altered {checkmark}Considering zonation patterns can turn plantations into restoration opportunities

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%