Back

Differential effects of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid on the regulation of liver endothelial permeability

Luty, M. T.; Borah, D.; Szafranska, K.; Giergiel, M.; Trzos, K.; McCourt, P.; Lekka, M.; Kotlinowski, J.; Zapotoczny, B.

2026-04-20 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.16.718907 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsFenofibrate is widely prescribed for hyperlipidaemia and has been associated with rare but severe cases of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), yet its effects on liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) remain to be investigated. LSECs maintain a highly permeable specialized sinusoidal barrier characterized by transcellular pores (fenestrations), regulating the bidirectional transfer of circulating compounds to and from the hepatocytes. As drug-induced alterations in fenestration architecture could influence xenobiotic access to hepatocytes, these changes may modulate pathways associated with DILI. Understanding the effects of fenofibrate on LSEC ultrastructure may therefore provide insights into previously underexplored endothelial contributions to hepatic drug responses. MethodsBoth fenofibrate and its active metabolite, fenofibric acid, were evaluated for their effects on LSEC ultrastructure, mechanical properties, and functional markers. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and were used to quantify fenestration architecture. AFM was additionally used to measure cellular mechanical properties, which were interpreted in the context of fluorescence-based quantification of cytoskeletal organization. Gene expression, viability, and cytotoxicity were assessed using PCR-based and biochemical assays. ResultsFenofibrate reduced fenestration number and porosity at both tested concentration (10, and 25 {micro}M). It also decreased the apparent Youngs modulus of LSECs, accompanied by changes in tubulin and actin architecture, without detectable cytotoxicity. In contrast, treatment with fenofibric acid did not result in significant structural or mechanical effects on LSECs, even at higher concentrations. ConclusionsTogether, these data identify LSECs as a drug-responsive hepatic cell type for fenofibrate, suggesting that LSECs could represent an underrecognized contributor to the complex, multifactorial processes underlying DILI. This work provides a framework for evaluating endothelial contributions to fenofibrate-associated liver effects in more complex models. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=105 SRC="FIGDIR/small/718907v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (51K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d3f60corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bea13aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14b27d8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@124e0d3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Fenofibrate reduces LSEC fenestrations and metabolic activity at higher concentrations, while its metabolite, fenofibric acid, does not affect LSEC, regardless of its concentration. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
2
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.7%
3
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
4
Journal of Lipid Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
6
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
9
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
13
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
15
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
20
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%