Back

Lung Ultrasound Feature Tracking to Quantify Regional Lung Strain in Mechanically Ventilated Pigs

Walters, R.; Allen, M. B.; Scheen, H.; Beam, C.; Waldrip, Z.; Singule-Kollisch, M.; Varisco, A.; Williams, J. G.; De Luca, D.; Varisco, B. M.

2026-04-20 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351053 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn patients requiring respiratory support, clinicians rely on physical exam, radiologic, laboratory, and ventilator-derived measures for the provision of sufficient support while minimizing ventilator and "work of breathing" induced lung injury. Point of care lung ultrasound (LUS) is a widely available tool in hospital and clinic environments. To date, LUS has not been used to evaluate lung strain. MethodsWe collected LUS images in four anesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked, and mechanically ventilated pigs being used for another experiment. A feature tracking tool was developed which tracked echo-bright lung structures in ten second clips obtained in triplicate of the right and left, upper and lower lung fields using tidal volumes of 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 mL/kg. Pleural lines were manually drawn and a program for quantifying lung strain developed with assistance from Anthropic Claude Artificial Intelligence tool. Structures were identified in inspiratory and expiratory frames and tracked bidirectionally with median strain per frame used for calculations. ResultsTriplicate measures of lung ultrasound images in four pigs had a median coefficients of variation of 35% (23-47% IQR) and linear modeling of strain with tidal volumes of 4-12 mL/kg showed positive correlation with R2 value ranging from 0.89 to 0.97. Strain measurements were similar after bronchial administration of 1.5M hydrochloric acid. ConclusionsRegional lung strain quantification using LUS is a viable and potentially useful tool for respiratory support management.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
6
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
26
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%