Back

Validation, characterization, and utility of markerless motion capture in a large cohort of pediatric patients with complex gait patterns

Chafetz, R.; Warshauer, S.; Waldron, S.; Kruger, K. M.; Donahue, S.; Bauer, J. P.; Sienko, S.; Bagley, A.; Courter, R.

2026-04-17 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351025 medRxiv
Show abstract

Markerless motion capture has emerged as a potential substitute for traditional marker-based systems, offering scalable, non-invasive acquisition of human movement. Despite increasing adoption in research and sports applications, its clinical utility for children with complex gait patterns remains an open question. To address this gap, simultaneous marker-based and markerless data were collected in 202 pediatric children (12.1 {+/-} 3.9 years). Marker-based kinematics were processed using the Shriners Children's Gait Model (SCGM), while markerless outputs were computed using Theia3D with identical Cardan sequences. Agreement between systems was evaluated using statistical parametric mapping (SPM), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and a gait pattern classification based on the plantarflexor-knee extension index. Markerless output systematically underestimated pelvic tilt, hip rotation, and knee rotation and demonstrated reduced between-subject variance in the transverse plane. SPM revealed widespread waveform differences, although most were of negligible effect, especially in the sagittal plane. Mean sagittal-plane RMSEs were < 5{degrees} for the knee and ankle and < 8{degrees} for the pelvis and hip. Coronal-plane deviations were < 7{degrees}, whereas transverse-plane errors exceeded 10{degrees}. RMSE increased significantly with body mass index and use of a walker (p < 0.001). Agreement in sagittal-plane gait classification was moderate between systems ({kappa} = 0.60; 67% overall concordance). These results indicate that markerless motion capture is suitable for analyses emphasizing sagittal deviations but remains limited for applications requiring precise axial or frontal-plane estimation. Future work should address algorithmic underestimation of transverse motion and evaluate markerless performance across increasing severity of gait deviation.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.5%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
6
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
7
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
8
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
9
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
11
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
14
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
17
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
18
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%