Back

sEEGnal: an automated EEG preprocessing pipeline evaluated against expert-driven preprocessing

Ramirez-Torano, F.; Hatlestad-Hall, C.; Drews, A.; Renvall, H.; Rossini, P. M.; Marra, C.; Haraldsen, I. H.; Maestu, F.; Bruna, R.

2026-04-20 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351021 medRxiv
Show abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) preprocessing is a critical yet time-consuming step that often relies on expert-driven, semi-automatic pipelines, limiting scalability and reproducibility across large datasets. In this work, we present sEEGnal, a fully automated and modular pipeline for EEG preprocessing designed to produce outputs comparable to expert-driven analyses while ensuring consistency and computational efficiency. The pipeline integrates three main modules: data standardization following the EEG extension of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), bad channel detection, and artifact identification, combining physiologically grounded criteria with independent component analysis and ICLabel-based classification. Performance was evaluated against manual preprocessing performed by EEG experts at two complementary levels: preprocessing metadata (bad channels, artifact duration, and rejected components) and EEG-derived measures. In addition, test-retest analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the pipeline across repeated recordings. Results show that sEEGnal achieves performance comparable to expert-driven preprocessing while preserving key neurophysiological features. Furthermore, the pipeline demonstrates reduced variability and increased consistency compared to human experts. These findings support sEEGnal as a robust and scalable solution for automated EEG preprocessing in both research and large-scale applications. HighlightsFully automated and modular EEG preprocessing pipeline. Benchmarked against expert-driven preprocessing. Comparable performance in metadata and EEG-derived measures. Demonstrates stable performance in test-retest recordings. BIDS-based framework for reproducible EEG data handling.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.3%
3
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
11
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%