Normative Benchmarks for the Parent-report Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (P-NQLS)
Liu, Y.; Youngstrom, E. A.; Nienaber, E. A.; Fristad, M. A.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS) is a brief, mental-health focused quality of life (QoL) scale with seven items that are non-overlapping with symptom scales. We developed a parent version (P-NQLS), obtained national norms, and calculated psychometric properties for the P-NQLS. MethodsParents (N=2251) of children aged 6-18 years who were representative of the U.S. population on key demographics completed the P-NQLS along with measures of depression, suicidality, internalizing, externalizing, and attention symptoms. We assessed the P-NQLSs factor structure through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and evaluated its internal reliability and convergent validity. Age- and sex-specific norms were established using GAMLSS with BCPE distributions and P-spline smoothers, with percentile curves and tables (5th-95th) provided. ResultsEFA suggested a one-factor solution for P-NQLS in the national sample. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbachs =0.85). P-NQLS total scores (M{+/-}SD=20.7{+/-}4.7, range=0-28, higher scores indicate higher QoL) were negatively correlated (all p<.0001) with depression (Pearsons r=-0.47), suicidality (r=-0.50), internalizing (r=-0.43), externalizing (r=-0.41), and attention (r=-0.37) symptoms. P-NQLS scores declined steadily with age in both sexes, with the most pronounced decreases (3-5 points) observed at lower percentiles (5th, 10th), suggesting greater age-related decline among children with lower baselines. Females scored slightly higher than males across most ages and percentile levels, though the differences were within one point. ConclusionsThe newly created P-NQLS, a 7-item parent-reported QoL scale with one underlying factor, demonstrates strong reliability and validity and has robust national norms for youth aged 6-18.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Special Issue: Demographic and Mental Health Assessments in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Updates and Longitudinal Trajectories 96%
- A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding the Emergence of Sex Differences in Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescence 91%
- Academic Success and Mental Health: The Paradox of Frontoparietal-Default Mode Network Coupling among Children Facing Poverty 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development 92%
- The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Internalizing Problems Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Dutch Children and Adolescents with and without Pre-Existing Mental Health Problems 95%
- What Treatment Outcomes Matter Most? A Q-study of Outcome Priority Profiles Among Youth with Lived Experience of Depression 94%
- The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal Controlling Parenting and Child-Perceived Mother-Child Attachment Mediate the Association between Maternal Adverse Childhood Experiences and Adolescent Behavioural Difficulties 94%
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 93%
- Validation of a 9-item Perceived Suicide Awareness Scale (PSAS-9) for adolescents 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in child and adolescent mental health across the COVID-19 pandemic (2018-2023): Insights from general population and clinical samples in the Netherlands 94%
- Early neurodevelopmental problems and risk for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in the general child population: a Japanese birth cohort study 93%
- Reward processing in children with Affective Dysregulation 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.