Back

Normative Benchmarks for the Parent-report Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (P-NQLS)

Liu, Y.; Youngstrom, E. A.; Nienaber, E. A.; Fristad, M. A.

2026-04-18 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.16.26350886 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe Nationwide Quality of Life Scale (NQLS) is a brief, mental-health focused quality of life (QoL) scale with seven items that are non-overlapping with symptom scales. We developed a parent version (P-NQLS), obtained national norms, and calculated psychometric properties for the P-NQLS. MethodsParents (N=2251) of children aged 6-18 years who were representative of the U.S. population on key demographics completed the P-NQLS along with measures of depression, suicidality, internalizing, externalizing, and attention symptoms. We assessed the P-NQLSs factor structure through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and evaluated its internal reliability and convergent validity. Age- and sex-specific norms were established using GAMLSS with BCPE distributions and P-spline smoothers, with percentile curves and tables (5th-95th) provided. ResultsEFA suggested a one-factor solution for P-NQLS in the national sample. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbachs =0.85). P-NQLS total scores (M{+/-}SD=20.7{+/-}4.7, range=0-28, higher scores indicate higher QoL) were negatively correlated (all p<.0001) with depression (Pearsons r=-0.47), suicidality (r=-0.50), internalizing (r=-0.43), externalizing (r=-0.41), and attention (r=-0.37) symptoms. P-NQLS scores declined steadily with age in both sexes, with the most pronounced decreases (3-5 points) observed at lower percentiles (5th, 10th), suggesting greater age-related decline among children with lower baselines. Females scored slightly higher than males across most ages and percentile levels, though the differences were within one point. ConclusionsThe newly created P-NQLS, a 7-item parent-reported QoL scale with one underlying factor, demonstrates strong reliability and validity and has robust national norms for youth aged 6-18.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.