Repeated SARS-CoV-2 Antigenic Exposures from Prior Vaccinations and Infections Demonstrate Limits of Antibody Durability and Breadth Against Newer Variants

BackgroundWidespread immunity from vaccination and infection has reduced COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, but this immunity varies across the population. Understanding how repeated antigenic exposures influence antibody responses helps to inform future vaccination strategies. MethodsSerum samples collected one and six months after XBB.1.5 vaccination from 25 generally healthy healthcare workers with varying exposure histories were assessed for neutralizing activity against a range of variants, from pre-Omicron variants to latest Omicron JN.1 sublineage variants and divergent BA.3.2 variants, using lentiviral pseudoviruses. Participants were stratified by vaccination and infection history. ResultsXBB.1.5 vaccination elicited broad neutralizing responses, with strong boosting against previously encountered antigens relative to vaccine-matched XBB.1.5 and newer variants. Geometric mean neutralization titers were generally comparable across exposure groups, indicating limited influence of prior Omicron infection or bivalent vaccination, though intra-group heterogeneity was observed. At six months, overall titers declined by 36-62%. Titers remained highest against the pre-Omicron and lowest against JN.1 sublineage variants. N-terminal glycosylation (DelS31, T22N) modestly affected neutralization. ConclusionsXBB.1.5 vaccination elicited broad neutralizing antibody responses against previously encountered and vaccine-matched antigens regardless of exposure history, but titers waned after six months. This waning, compounded by continued emergence of immune-evasive variants and heterogenous population immunity, underscores the need for continually monitoring neutralizing antibody durability and breadth to guide evidence-based COVID-19 vaccine formulation updates.