Back

Plasmodium falciparum invasion ligand gene transcript profiles in different populations

Lantero Escolar, E.; Stewart, L. B.; Singh, B.; Claessens, A.; Amambua-Ngwa, A.; Conway, D.

2026-04-15 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.15.718653 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmodium falciparum merozoites invade erythrocytes using various ligand-receptor interactions. Important ligands encoded by the eba and Rh gene families have varying expression levels in different parasite isolates, affecting their vaccine candidacy. Analyses of clinical isolates from endemic areas in Africa have indicated that most variation in these expression profiles exists within each local area, and only minor differences are seen between areas, although comparisons with non-African populations have not previously been performed. To enable this, relative transcript levels of three eba genes and five Rh genes have been analysed in new population samples, Malaysian isolates sampled from Sabah State in Borneo prior to endemic malaria elimination, and Gambian isolates, cultured under the same conditions to harvest schizonts for reverse transcription quantitative PCR assays. Significant differences between these populations were seen for three of the ligand genes, levels of eba175 being higher in Malaysia, while levels of eba181 and Rh2b were lower in Malaysia. The gene transcript profiles did not differ between single genotype and or multiple-genotype isolates. The distinctness of the Malaysian population expression profile was also supported by comparing previous data on clinical isolates from Ghana. In tests for correlation with previously determined parasite multiplication rates, eba181 transcript levels correlated positively among Malaysian isolates but not among Gambian isolates. These findings suggest that expression of three P. falciparum merozoite ligands involved in invasion may be regionally differentiated, and further analysis of Asian parasite populations would be important if vaccines based on these candidates are to be considered for future use.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
9
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
10
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
11
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
13
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%