Back

Relative Index of Chimeric Expression (RICE) Analysis: A Quantitative Approach for Chimeric RNAs Using FusionBlaster

Haddox, S.; Mao, Y.; Tajammal, A.; Engel, J.; Lynch, S.; Huang, N.; Raby, K.; Kian, A.; Li, H.

2026-04-18 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.15.718257 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric RNA molecules, which contain nucleotide sequences originating from multiple genes, are generated by chromosomal rearrangements, transcriptional read-throughs, or trans-splicing between separate parental transcripts. Chimeric RNAs have been functionally validated in both pathological and normal healthy physiological contexts indicating the biological significance of chimeric RNA expression. There is, however, currently no standard for computationally quantifying chimeric RNA expression and only limited benchmarking data available for the few chimeric RNA detection software that attempt to measure the abundance of the predicted chimeras. Here, we develop the relative index of chimeric expression, RICE, that is calculated based on the relative expression of chimeric transcripts compared to the respective parental WT transcripts. We evaluate three different methods for generating this measurement from simulated RNA sequencing data with known transcript abundances. Our BLAST-based approach outperforms STAR and Kallisto based approaches when considering both accuracy and consistency between simulated data of different read lengths and sequencing depths. We further demonstrate that RICE values can be validated using qPCR and are sensitive to dynamic conditions using siRNA targeting chimeric RNA expression. Finally, we apply our RICE analysis pipeline to clinical prostate cancer data. We quantify over 1200 chimeric RNAs in primary prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, and non-cancer tissue samples from GTEx. Our differential RICE analysis revealed a clustering of prostate cancer tissue samples from three different sequencing cohorts distinct from their associated tissue type noncancer GTEx clusters. Our pipeline is publicly available on github and can be run on a personal laptop with computational resources and processing time dependent on the number of quantified chimeras.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.5%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.4%
3
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
6
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
19
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%