Back

Individualized Per-Site Meta-Federated Feature Learning (iPS-MFFL) for Privacy-Preserving Brain Tumor MRI Classification under non-IID Heterogeneity

Hakata, Y.; Oikawa, M.; Fujisawa, S.

2026-04-17 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.15.26351000 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across institutions without sharing patient-level data. However, standard FL algorithms such as FedAvg degrade under non-independently and non-identically distributed (non-IID) data, a prevalent condition when patient demographics, scanner hardware, and disease prevalence differ across hospital sites. Objective. We propose iPS-MFFL (Individualized Per-Site Meta-Federated Feature Learning), a federated framework with a hierarchical local-model architecture that addresses non-IID heterogeneity through (1) a shared feature extractor, (2) multiple weak-learner classification heads that can be trained with heterogeneous training objectives to promote complementary decision boundaries, (3) independent per-learner server aggregation so that each weak learner's parameters are averaged only with its counterparts at other clients, and (4) a lightweight meta-model, itself federated, that adaptively stacks the weak-learner outputs. Methods. We evaluate on the Brain Tumor MRI Classification dataset (7,200 images; 4 classes: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, no tumor) partitioned across K = 5 simulated hospital sites using Dirichlet non-IID sampling (alpha = 0.3). Four baselines are compared: Local-only training, FedAvg, FedProx, and Freeze-FT. All experiments are repeated over three random seeds (13, 42, 2025) and evaluated using paired t-tests, Cohen's d effect sizes, and post-hoc power analysis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.8%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
4
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
19
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
26
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%
28
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%
30
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%