Back

An Exploratory Study on the Long-Term Impact of Voiding Cystourethrogram (VCUG)

McDonald, A.; Sullivan, K.

2026-04-17 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350983 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVEThis study investigates the long-term impacts of childhood exposure to voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), a diagnostic procedure for vesicoureteral reflux. Primary outcomes include long-term health outcomes, mental health disorders, healthcare avoidance, and participation in risky behaviors compared to a control group. METHODSA 9-month retrospective cohort study was conducted with adults who received most of their medical care in the U.S. Respondents self-reported health metrics, behaviors, and outcomes via a 20-minute survey. Respondents were divided into two groups: those who remembered undergoing at least one VCUG in childhood (VCUG group), and those who did not (control group). RESULTSOf 334 respondents, 204 (61%) were in the VCUG group (mean age: 29, 70% female) and 130 (39%) were controls (mean age: 34, 70% female). Notable findings include: 47% of VCUG respondents were diagnosed with depression compared to 27% of controls ({chi}{superscript 2} = 13.51, p = 0.0002); 15% of female-born VCUG respondents reported they would never visit a gynecologist compared to 2% of controls ({chi}{superscript 2} = 17.29, p < 0.001); 34% of VCUG respondents smoked regularly compared to 5% of controls ({chi}{superscript 2} = 35.85, p < 0.001); and 11% of VCUG respondents regularly missed work compared to 1% of controls ({chi}{superscript 2} = 11.61, p = 0.0006). These findings highlight the need for further research and clinical consideration of VCUGs long-term consequences. CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that the effects of childhood VCUG extend into adulthood. Our findings underscore the need to reassess informed consent protocols and consider full-scale studies to minimize bias.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.