Back

SIEVE: Locus-Anchored Drug Prioritization for Complex Disorders

Strobl, E. V.

2026-04-17 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350958 medRxiv
Show abstract

Motivation: Complex disorders arise from multiple genetic mechanisms, but most drug-prioritization methods treat each disorder as a single phenotype and therefore miss locus-specific therapeutic opportunities. Results: We present SIEVE, a framework that decomposes complex disorders into genetically localized subphenotypes and links GWAS summary statistics, reference expression, and perturbational transcriptional profiles to prioritize compounds that target locus-anchored disease mechanisms. SIEVE also constructs genetically calibrated mechanism vectors, projects away nonspecific expression programs using negative anchors, and aggregates evidence across cell lines, doses, and time points to produce robust drug rankings. Across simulations and analyses of real data, SIEVE improves compound prioritization relative to existing methods and shows that subphenotype-aware, genetics-guided modeling can sharpen therapeutic discovery in heterogeneous disorders. Availability and Implementation: R implementation: github.com/ericstrobl/SIEVE.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.1%
2
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
7
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
8
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
11
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
12
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
23
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%