Back

First-in-Human Safety and Tolerability Study of TOP-N53, a NO-Releasing PDE5 Inhibitor, in Healthy Volunteers

Seitz, F.; Gerth, H. U.; Tenor, H.; Ludin, C.; Bhide, Y.; Schaefer, M.; Cracowski, J.-L.; Naef, R.

2026-04-17 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350931 medRxiv
Show abstract

Chronic wounds, such as diabetic and ischemic ulcers, involve impaired perfusion and delayed healing. TOP-N53 is a novel bifunctional molecule combining nitric oxide (NO) release with phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibition to enhance local NO-cGMP signalling, resulting in vasodilation and angiogenesis. This first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled Phase I trial assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single subcutaneous TOP-N53 doses in 29 healthy male volunteers. Each participant received injections of TOP-N53 and vehicle in the same forearm, but either at the proximal or at the distal site in an intra-individually blinded manner. Safety assessments included local and systemic parameters. PK and PD responses were evaluated by analysis of TOP-N53 and its bioactivation metabolite TOP-52 in plasma, and by Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI), a non-invasive method to measure skin perfusion, respectively. TOP-N53 was safe and well tolerated, with no serious adverse events or local or systemic adverse reactions. Plasma concentrations remained below the quantification limit and LSCI showed sustained dose-dependent increases in local skin perfusion at doses of 4.84 {micro}g and 9.075 {micro}g TOP-N53 SC for up to 24 h post injection when compared to vehicle. These findings support the favourable safety and tolerability profile of TOP-N53 associated with locally improved skin perfusion, encouraging its further clinical development as a topical treatment for chronic wounds with microvascular dysfunction.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.