Back

Micro-Doppler Radar Identifies Movement Asymmetries After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Onks, C. A.; Zeng, C.; Creath, R.; Simone, B. D.; Nyland, J. E.; Murphy, T. E.; Kishel, L. A.; Ardat, B. A.; Venezia, V. A.; Wiggins, A. M.; Shaffer, B. R.; Narayanan, R. M.

2026-04-21 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350397 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatients who have undergone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) have a 6-24% chance of either re-tearing or having subsequent knee surgery. To date there have been no practical validated risk prediction models that can be easily implemented into clinical workflow for re-injury risk. Micro-Doppler radar (MDR) provides a promising solution. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive ability of MDR to identify persons with a previous ACLR relative to an age and sex matched healthy control. MethodsACLR patients (n=81) and controls (n=100) performed drop box jump, sit to stand (STS), and walking trials as MDR signatures were collected. A 1D Convolutional Neural Network was developed to evaluate each activity individually followed by the development of a fusion model validation using all three activities. ResultsThe STS model individually achieved the highest overall accuracy of 82.3%, with a sensitivity of 71.6% and specificity of 91.0%. The fusion model using all activities achieved a peak overall accuracy to detect ACLR of 86.2%, 80.3% sensitivity, and 91% specificity. ConclusionsCurrently, there is no clinically validated, efficient approach to objectively evaluate human motion at the point of care. When coupled with machine learning, MDR accurately differentiates ACLR from control groups by identifying complex biomechanical asymmetries, with classification performance comparable to or exceeding that of motion capture. Future research is needed to determine if MDR can be used in conjunction with risk prediction modeling. Key pointsMicro-Doppler radar provides a promising new solution to identify important human motion asymmetries in clinical settings. Here we evaluated a group of patients who have a history of Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction versus a control group. Simple movements performed in the presence of the micro-Doppler radar system were used to identify the 2 groups with accuracy comparable or superior to motion capture systems.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
11.0%
3
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
10
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%